is she following protocol? is that the standard procedure to take?
if shes not doing her job correctly, regardless of how we feel, then she needs to face the consequences. simple as that.
lets flip this a bit. lets say the procedure was to inform ICE about detainees, but she didnt. and was reprimanded? would that be a problem? im sure most of you would want her to face some consequences.
in the end shes not following the guidelines set forth by her agency. in this situation the procedure is to NOT call ICE. she is obviously overstepping some boundaries.
i think there is more to the story. but i dont trust the source article.
patricularly because they slander richardson by saying he is corrupt when he is not. he was accused of fraud and "pay to play" (around the time barry nominated him for sec. of commerce [coincidentally]
)
but was eventually cleared by a grand jury.
garbage article.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
