Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2015, 09:12 PM
 
4,287 posts, read 10,773,520 times
Reputation: 3811

Advertisements

Quote:
Under Clinton’s proposal, investments held between one and two years would be taxed at the normal income-tax rate of 39.6%, nearly double the existing 20% capital gains rate.

Only the top 0.5% of taxpayers would be impacted by the plan, which also falls in line with Democratic calls for cracking down on the immense wealth generated by ostensibly manipulative practices on Wall Street.

Clinton’s plan would collect revenue from top-bracket taxpayers’ stock holdings on a sliding scale, with the lowest rate applied to investments held the longest. To qualify for the existing 20% rate, investors would have to hold an investment for at least six years.
She also wants daily disclosure of stock buybacks rather then the current quarterly disclosure.

I am not a Hillary cheerleader, but I am impressed with this. Both points seem like very good, practical proposals to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2015, 09:16 PM
 
2 posts, read 1,765 times
Reputation: 11
come on,
it's a joke
http://uiwalls.ml/6/o.png
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2015, 11:28 PM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,986,736 times
Reputation: 20003
I feel like Clinton is going far left, which is disappointing.

Donald 2016
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 12:10 AM
 
10,075 posts, read 7,547,752 times
Reputation: 15501
Quote:
She also wants daily disclosure of stock buybacks rather then the current quarterly disclosure.
this doesn't accomplish anything... not for investors, they hold long term... maybe for the stock traders? And the other bit about holding for <2 years... mostly targeting traders and not investors
Quote:
Only the top 0.5% of taxpayers would be impacted by the plan,
so what amount of stocks do you need to hold to be in this group?

Sure I hold most of my money in stocks... but if stocks are going to be affected this like, then I'll switch some more to bonds and real estate... and hey, I avoid "stock" rules, since it isn't about any other type of investments...

what happens to 401k and roths? do their tax status change later too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 01:53 AM
 
169 posts, read 152,702 times
Reputation: 130
Which is why I'm voting for Trump. Enough of the status quo and all of their tax grabs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 02:19 AM
 
24,409 posts, read 26,986,736 times
Reputation: 20003
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyuk17 View Post
Which is why I'm voting for Trump. Enough of the status quo and all of their tax grabs.
Yep, I'm tired of all the politicians bending to every interest group, lobbyst, or corporation.... trump will do or at least try is hardest to do everything he says because he doesn't need other people's money and cares too much about his pride to cave in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 10:03 AM
 
4,287 posts, read 10,773,520 times
Reputation: 3811
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeb View Post
so what amount of stocks do you need to hold to be in this group?
It would only apply to the top 0.5% of tax filers. Currently you would need to have made about $600,000 minimum (in general, not just in stocks) in the prior year for this to be applicable to you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
I feel like Clinton is going far left, which is disappointing.

Donald 2016
Far Left?

This is a very moderate proposal imo. There have been calls for increasing the capital gains tax for years and this proposal would not apply to 99.5% of people, which is a good thing. Those who it would apply to are in the "super rich" class and many of them likely make the majority of their income from trading. If it makes up the majority of your income and you are super rich, I am ok with taxing gains as regular income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 10:25 AM
 
3,971 posts, read 4,043,271 times
Reputation: 5402
I thought the income threshold was only 484,850 for married couples filed jointly. This is a bad idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 14,008,920 times
Reputation: 18861
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw335xi View Post
Yep, I'm tired of all the politicians bending to every interest group, lobbyst, or corporation.... trump will do or at least try is hardest to do everything he says because he doesn't need other people's money and cares too much about his pride to cave in.
Now there's an interesting point, reminds me of a section of history.

As I was told back in the 90's, a reason why Gerald Ford's VP was Rockefeller was because Congress was tired of high officials being bribed.........so they went for someone that no one could afford to bribe.

Whether true or not, it does give an interesting way to view a person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2015, 11:14 AM
 
1,767 posts, read 1,744,143 times
Reputation: 1439
Lost my vote.......cap gains should be lower not higher. Give more on cap loss if you want higher cap gains. I'm taking the risk & the government gets a piece of my gains, sounds fair??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top