Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2016, 10:46 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,215,794 times
Reputation: 3757

Advertisements

Earnings being down doesn't translate into a bear market or even a recession. Currently, it would take the Fed to aggressively raise rates to engineer a recession. For the foreseeable future that isn't happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2016, 11:40 AM
 
106,758 posts, read 108,973,015 times
Reputation: 80218
not what i said . i said stocks are running out of steam and based on their almost 7 year cycles time too .

the fact we have decreased earnings coupled with increased dividends with quite a few exceeding earnings are not good signs for strong gains from equity's . basically the stocks are saying there is little we can do to grow your money so take some back , when this happens .

what i said is many managers are very cautious at this point and will rather hide out in bonds until the eventual dip happens .
nothing much has changed in the world and things are still structurally unsound .

for long term investors like many of us we ride it down and ride it up . but many pro's who have no such restrictions on them to be fully invested are not committing much money to propel things
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 11:52 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,215,794 times
Reputation: 3757
In one of your posts you talked about a 20-50% decline..thats a severe bear market.....

Markets move on expectations and my point is that with 70% of companies beating estimates that's a big positive and stocks responded in kind....actually if you look really closely at the earnings if you take out oil companies the earnings did much better overall...again, yes they are down, but not to warrant a severe decline in the market.....and "many managers being cautious " is a very good sign for stocks from a contrarian point of view....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 11:53 AM
 
106,758 posts, read 108,973,015 times
Reputation: 80218
check your past . just about every 7-8 years we have seen those declines for quite a while now .

there is not a direct link to earnings and stock prices as they happen , it is the future perception that counts not the here and now . when you give away more than you earn that does not sit well for the near future .

did you know the higher the current earnings the smaller the market gains ?


gains and corporate profits dont flow together more often than not.

in the book a random walk down wall street 548 nyse issues were tracked and analyzed over 5 year periods and the results were the performance had no relationship between the technical and fundamental signals and the actual stock performance ..

ned davis research took another look at the relationship and going as far back as 1927 they found the biggest gains are coming out of bear markets , not falling from a bull market .


when profits rose more than

20% the s&p returned a mere 1.3% in gains

10 to 20% saw 5.8% in gains

(-10% to + 10% in profits saw a 9.3% jump in gains

(-10%) to (-25%) drop in profits saw 28.6% gains

(-25%) and lower saw a -28% drop in share price.


as you see the biggest gains come out of the bleakest of times just when you least expected .

the problem now is no steam and little capital spending to improve productivity and increase business and market share in the NEAR future . the downside is far greater than the upside at this point .

potentially we are due for a 20-50% decline and indications are if we are lucky stocks will squeak out mid to high single digit returns in the near term .

Last edited by mathjak107; 09-19-2016 at 12:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 12:36 PM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,215,794 times
Reputation: 3757
you keep barking out 20-50% market decline talk..thats a monumental bear market...I feel the economy is fine, valuations are fair and sentiment is still very very cautious which I love to see....Lets just agree to disagree.....in the meantime you enjoy your retirement and I will stay fully invested.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 01:36 PM
 
106,758 posts, read 108,973,015 times
Reputation: 80218
the economy is okay , it isn't fine but regardless something that is not even on the radar ALWAYS is what kicks off the next downturn . it always plays out like that . and down we go . for how long , no one kmows .

i am invested too and i have no intention of timing things . but it isn't about us . it is about the professional money that drives us higher and lower and that money sees higher risk than reward and little reason to be invested much today .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,765 posts, read 5,069,067 times
Reputation: 9214
Fifty percent declines are pretty rare... there have been only three of that magnitude in the U.S. over the past 75 years.

Smaller declines happen pretty frequently. Since 2009 we've had six corrections of approximately 10%-20% in magnitude. They don't come on any particular time table, IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 02:16 PM
 
106,758 posts, read 108,973,015 times
Reputation: 80218
the last 20 years we have had a major drop every 7-8 years .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,765 posts, read 5,069,067 times
Reputation: 9214
You lost me on that one. Yes, we did have two bears with the onsets separated by eight years. One that started in 2000 and one that started in 2008. Prior to that there was nothing major or lasting until we go back to 1987.

Sure, there were 1990 and 1998, but at least from a market perspective they were no worse than 2011, all were roughly 20% decline. 1990 was arguably scarier... kind of a warm up for the 2008 financial crisis, but the market loss was modest and it recovered quickly and never looked back. Even so, there was no magic 7-year or 8-year spacing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 03:07 PM
 
106,758 posts, read 108,973,015 times
Reputation: 80218
which all pretty much means with little steam left 8 years in to the bull market , falling corporate profits and potentially rising rates there is a pretty good chance we are more likely due than not .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top