Why pay recruiter heavy commission?

[hnsq]

Originally Posted by wheelsup

You gave an example of how having a recruiter could save money. I simply stated that unless that one recruiter was doing nothing but recruiting one person, it wouldn't make any sense.

Then you said your company has recruiters on staff. Then you said your company outsources its recruiting.

Not sure how that is stupidity. You aren't telling the whole truth and as such it's hard to make any sort of argument when you keep changing the playing field. Toodles.

Seriously? Is it so hard to believe that a company has recruiting staff and still outsources a portion of it?

By your logic, no company with an offshore IT contractor has ANY internal IT support. I haven't changed what I say at all. Stop and actually think about this for a minute.

[ruminex]

Originally Posted by hnsq

Seriously? Is it so hard to believe that a company has recruiting staff and still outsources a portion of it?

By your logic, no company with an offshore IT contractor has ANY internal IT support. I haven't changed what I say at all. Stop and actually think about this for a minute.

I concur with you. Companies such as "cummins" entirely outsource their recruitment and offshore to cut-down on cost. I also know big IT companies have entirely outsourced recruiting needs. If manufacturing can be outsourced, why not recruitment, as the world has shrunk thanks to Internet and social networking sites and forums like this one.

[ruminex]

Originally Posted by manderly6

Have you figured out how many people you will need to place to stay in business?

By the way, are you in recruitment business? You seem to be knowing more.