Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Kentucky
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:08 AM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,480,204 times
Reputation: 12187

Advertisements

Heck yes. Part of it is because he have some very impoverished areas and taxes form a way to redistribute wealth from the rich areas in the Golden Triangle & Western KY to those areas.

We also have WAY too many 'pet projects' which eat up our budget. I-66 is an excellent example of this. The millions of dollars used on this project which will never be built could have been used for 'enterprise zones' to bring in jobs to Eastern KY. Instead 99% of the money went to out of state groups to study a road which will never be built.

Maybe Beshear's casino plan could help. Having a Renosboro and Lou-evil would bring a lot of money in, sure is closer than going to Nevada or Atlantic City. Maybe we should legalize prostitution and marijuana as well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2008, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Near L.A.
4,108 posts, read 10,804,487 times
Reputation: 3444
Default JMT is right

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMT View Post
I'm sorry for popping in here. Unlike some people, I don't normally jump to other states' forums to make negative posts about those states. But I happened to be browsing the Kentucky forum, this topic caught my eye, and in today's paper there's an article about this topic.

The American Legislative Exchange Council just released a study of the economic health of the 50 states that reveals Kentucky is ranked 46th (1st being best, 50th being worst). Kentucky was chided for "its high personal, business and estate taxes, high workers compensation costs and its forced unionism."

The 16 components used to create the rankings:
• Highest marginal personal income tax rate
• Highest marginal corporate income tax rate
• Progressivity of the personal income tax system
• Property tax burden
• Sales tax burden
• Tax burden from all remaining taxes
• Estate tax/Inheritance tax (Yes or No)
• Recent Tax Policy Changes 2005-06
• Debt service as share of tax revenue
• Public employees per 10,000 residents
• Quality of state legal system
• State minimum wage
• Workers’ Compensation Costs
• Right-to-work state (Yes or No)
• Tax/Expenditure Limit
• Education Freedom Index

The bottom 5:
50. Vermont
49. New York
48. Rhode Island
47. Ohio
46. Kentucky
45. Hawaii

The top 5:
1. Utah
2. Arizona
3. South Dakota
4. Wyoming
5. Tennessee

The study can be found here:
http://www.alec.org/fileadmin/newPDF/ALEC_Competitiveness_Index.pdf (broken link)
I'm afraid he's right.

Kentucky has a large increase in the population of retiring baby boomers who are coming back to their "homeland" to, well, retire. The tax burden here is not overwhelming for retirees. But, for the younger generations who HAVE to work, well, I'm afraid A.L.E.C. is right on in its conclusions. It's bad when Mississippi, Alabama, Indiana, and Arkansas are much more successful in landing high salary, corporate- or industrial-based individuals with academic degrees.

Three of the top 5 states--Utah, Arizona, and Tennessee--are experience phenomenal growth right now. Kentucky has the diverse climate, intellectual capital, urban charm, low crime rate, and low personal income tax rates. It does not have the business-friendly tax rates or political savvy or willpower to make Ky. the next economic frontier.

That said, Louisville, Northern Kentucky, and to some extent Bowling Green and Lexington are not doing too bad by themselves and can essentially be thanked for the state's population growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2008, 09:14 AM
 
28 posts, read 94,474 times
Reputation: 14
yes we are in every state!!! 35% of our income plus the inflation that comes with the federal reserve that makes things cost allot more than their worth so we end up losing 50% of our hard earned money!!!

vote for Ron Paul he believes in less big government and less taxes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2008, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Where there is too much snow!
7,685 posts, read 13,144,504 times
Reputation: 4376
Every state in the city data forum has this question/ post. And the answer is "YES" everywhwere you go we are all over Taxed. And the politicians don't care if we like it or not, or if we complain about it or not. Because they know that as long as we pay the taxes, they're going to squander it away.

Just my two cents worth ,.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Kentucky
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top