Quote:
Originally Posted by martinjsxx
Has anyone ever successfully beaten a speeding ticket with the defense that they were going the "speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing"?
|
Yes, although I cannot remember all the details.
Some years ago there was a case in NJ (if memory serves). Driver was exceeding the posted speed limit. Argued something along the lines of "conditions permitting" and got away with it. Pretty sure this was all pre-internet. There were articles in the newspapers at the time.
As a practical matter, that kind of defense is useless these days. Speed limits are an arbitrary number designed to give police maximum power to ticket at will. Many experts and policy makers openly admit that highway speed limits are set with the assumption that people will travel 10-15 mph over the posted limit. In effect, it is an admission that 55 really means 65-70. The beauty of it is that they can still collect a tribute from those traveling 59mph.
Speed limits are supposed to be set using the 85th percentile rule.
A good explanation borrowed from a state government document:
"Engineers recommend setting limits at the 85th percentile speed, where 85% of freely flowing traffic travels at or below that speed under ideal road conditions. The 85th percentile method is considered the best way to represent what is “reasonable” and “proper” as perceived by the motorists. When 85% of drivers voluntarily comply with speed limits, it is possible and reasonable to enforce these limits."
If that method were used around here, Nassau and Suffolk counties would go broke. Even after factoring in all the police they could retire because there was nothing for them to do.