Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2009, 01:08 AM
 
3 posts, read 11,378 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/ny...f=weekinreview

How dare these liberals force projects in Scarsdale and Larchmont. Are the Democrats and Barry that stupid? 2010 election will be interesting... can't wait
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2009, 04:18 AM
 
Location: Massapequa, NY
1,056 posts, read 2,141,125 times
Reputation: 58
are you saying there arent section 8 houses on long island yet? theres tons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 06:30 AM
 
1,010 posts, read 3,931,272 times
Reputation: 187
Get your facts straight. These aren't section 8 houses; they're moderate income. (I had to hoot at the article yesterday where someone from Chappaqua said that people who can't afford 2 cars shouldn't live there. The moderate income guidelines go up to $75K for a family of 4 in Westchester.) It's about municipalities that have zoning policies designed to keep out all the poor people (minimum 2 acres, et cetera). Also, the problem is of Westchester's own making. The suit would have been tossed if the county had not applied for federal money and lied about how it was handling segregation.

You could just as easily ask why the middle income towns have to bear the brunt of affordable housing.

In response to whether it could happen on LI: If someone files a lawsuit and if Nassau or Suffolk was as stupid as Westchester (I would never rule out this possibility).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Hamburg, NY
1,199 posts, read 2,869,915 times
Reputation: 1176
Well at least Port Washington won't have to do anything. We already have Harbor Homes (public housing) and lots of section 8 people in Manorhaven. This hasn't caused white/rich people to move out of the area. It seems to work ok here. Would it work in a place like Massapequa? That might be a different story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 11:21 AM
 
3 posts, read 11,378 times
Reputation: 10
I am aware there is tons public housing throughout the island. It usually has a negative effect on the communities. Glen Cove rings a bell? That high school is a zoo. I remember playing them in basketball…the student body in the stands and hallways were animals. The schools suffer when there is significant public housing in the district.

If I was buying a house in upper- middle class neighborhood I would not want this forced on my community
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Hamburg, NY
1,199 posts, read 2,869,915 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycliguy View Post
I am aware there is tons public housing throughout the island. It usually has a negative effect on the communities. Glen Cove rings a bell? That high school is a zoo. I remember playing them in basketball…the student body in the stands and hallways were animals. The schools suffer when there is significant public housing in the district.

If I was buying a house in upper- middle class neighborhood I would not want this forced on my community
Glen Cove is a good example of where it hasn't worked so well. I think it presently works ok in places like Port Washington, Roslyn and Manhasset because the locations of those places are just so desirable that the rich/upper middle class will continue to move there anyways.

Glen Cove has a slow train ride and a little out of the way and thus its gotten out of balance demographically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 08:33 PM
 
1,615 posts, read 3,581,218 times
Reputation: 1115
Go to Mastic beach/ mastic / shirley...welcome to section 8 housing. The sex offenders will be next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Hamburg, NY
1,199 posts, read 2,869,915 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongIslandCitizen View Post
Go to Mastic beach/ mastic / shirley...welcome to section 8 housing. The sex offenders will be next.

No thanks, they can keep them!

I'm not a proponant of socially engineering neighborhoods. I'm just saying that it doesn't have to become a Glen Cove or Huntington Station if they were to go through with building subsidized or section 8 housing. Port Washington, Roslyn and Manhasset all have areas of Section 8 housing and it hasn't caused those places to totally fall apart. I can understand though not wanting to take that chance if you have paid good money to live in a nice area. To do something like this seems a little too forced to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Inis Fada
16,966 posts, read 34,718,970 times
Reputation: 7724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Port North View Post
Well at least Port Washington won't have to do anything. We already have Harbor Homes (public housing) and lots of section 8 people in Manorhaven. This hasn't caused white/rich people to move out of the area. It seems to work ok here. Would it work in a place like Massapequa? That might be a different story.
What about areas like Garden City, Belle Terre, Old Field? You're going to see far more resistance there than in Massapequa if this should come to pass on LI.

The areas in Westchester are very wealthy, nevermind race. If a wealthy African American surgeon wanted to buy in Larchmont, he could afford to do so and by all rights should do so. Would he be met by an angry mob carrying torches and crosses? Highly unlikely. To turn around and 'acquire' properties and homes in order to create housing for the poor because an area is wealthy AND white? Isn't that a form of discrimination?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2009, 10:33 AM
 
1,010 posts, read 3,931,272 times
Reputation: 187
The issue is that they were building moderate income housing previously, but not putting it anywhere rich and white. It's perfectly fair that if it's going to be built, the burden should be spread out. They aren't being targeted, as such. They were given special privileges for being rich and white, and now those privileges are being taken away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top