Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-04-2014, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,865,506 times
Reputation: 4049

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
We already have one.
It's called Griffith Park.
Bob.
Not in the basin. The OP specifically mentions that LAs parks tend to be on the hillsides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2014, 07:03 PM
 
Location: SoCal
559 posts, read 1,380,190 times
Reputation: 625
Why does LA have to try to look like everyone else?

I often hear that LA is one of the most park-poor cities in the country but I don't seem to see the existing parks to be that crowded. Is there any data that a large park would be a better use of the land vs. say, affordable or supportive housing?

Does Kenny Hahn Park meet the requirements for a large park in the basin? It's on a hill but not in "the hills."

As a non-golfer, I agree with munchitup that golf courses are great candidates for park conversion, especially since they are egregious water hogs.

Last edited by drunk on kool aid; 05-04-2014 at 07:06 PM.. Reason: formatting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2014, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,613,721 times
Reputation: 7477
If there was any justice, those west side neighborhoods that tried to block the Expo Line would be turned into a large park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2014, 07:26 PM
 
193 posts, read 465,606 times
Reputation: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by timtemtym View Post
MacArthur Park! I would have extended it west about 10 blocks and east about 10 blocks making a mall towards downtown LA. Linear Parks are much more useful for getting access to more people and making for great trails. The LA River trail is long but it's not too attractive for most of its run.
thats why revitalizing the full length of the river would be so awesome. Itd create essentially one gigantic park that serves a huge portion of the county

I like your macarthur park idea to some extent, but lets treat the neighborhood as something more than a path to downtown, and its size would be tough to actually do in practice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2014, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,422,622 times
Reputation: 6288
The LA River:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2014, 09:31 PM
 
4,235 posts, read 14,067,197 times
Reputation: 4253
Why Can't LA Have a Big, Comprehensive LA River Restoration? - LA River Rising - Curbed LA

several links within this one about LA River restoration, bike paths, what-have-you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2014, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,564 posts, read 10,987,037 times
Reputation: 10815
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Not in the basin. The OP specifically mentions that LAs parks tend to be on the hillsides.
The basin is the entire city of Los Angeles.
If you doubt this, watch and local tv weather report.

Bob.,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,865,506 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
The basin is the entire city of Los Angeles.
If you doubt this, watch and local tv weather report.

Bob.,
Why do you insist on being contrary? The OP made it clear that he was asking where you would put a park in the flatlands of LA. Griffith Park is clearly on a hillside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 10:20 AM
 
Location: New Orleans
2,322 posts, read 2,994,262 times
Reputation: 1606
I honestly have never felt an issue with the amount of park space in LA. There are enough beaches and hills where it isn't a problem. Could we use more parks... Absolutely! But do we need a Central Park or Piedmont park equivalent? No. Has this been a problem for anybody else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,564 posts, read 10,987,037 times
Reputation: 10815
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Why do you insist on being contrary? The OP made it clear that he was asking where you would put a park in the flatlands of LA. Griffith Park is clearly on a hillside.

Contrary, conscmary, the op stated "basin", nothing about flatlands.
Agaain, The Los Angeles basin consist of the entire city, and in fact if you listen to local tv, even the inland empire is considered the basin.
You need to get your facts straight.

Bob.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top