Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2014, 06:23 PM
 
95 posts, read 161,139 times
Reputation: 63

Advertisements

I'm considering purchasing a few condos in Burbank for a few relatives to live in for about 4 years and sell hopefully for a profit.

Why are prices for condos (and single family homes too) so much cheaper relative to other surrounding areas in L.A. (i.e. Silver Lake, Los Feliz, West Hollywood, Hollywood Hills)?

Burbank is safe and sort of convenient to most areas of film work (the studios, DTLA, Beverly Hills). I don't see any serious problems except for maybe the air pollution issue of it being so inland...wondering if I'm overlooking a serious issue that keeps real estate prices so low there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2014, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Southern California
4,453 posts, read 6,798,610 times
Reputation: 2238
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgermaine View Post
I'm considering purchasing a few condos in Burbank for a few relatives to live in for about 4 years and sell hopefully for a profit.

Why are prices for condos (and single family homes too) so much cheaper relative to other surrounding areas in L.A. (i.e. Silver Lake, Los Feliz, West Hollywood, Hollywood Hills)?

Burbank is safe and sort of convenient to most areas of film work (the studios, DTLA, Beverly Hills). I don't see any serious problems except for maybe the air pollution issue of it being so inland...wondering if I'm overlooking a serious issue that keeps real estate prices so low there?
Bad commute into DTLA, Century City, Santa Monica, Culver City, so yes there is a studio there, but there are more higher paying jobs in the basin. People don't want to drive so they pay more to live in the basin.

I don't know how familiar you are with the 101S, but it sucks throughout the day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 07:19 PM
 
4,213 posts, read 8,305,577 times
Reputation: 2680
Because it's the valley vs the basin. The basin is way more expensive. SFV in general is very affordable Studio City/uNiversal City is the most and still quite a bit less than over the hill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 09:56 PM
 
96 posts, read 170,452 times
Reputation: 75
It's because the housing stock is 85% 3BR 1BA houses from the 1950's with little character. Nice area, terrible architecture.

Yes, the commute to the west side is bad. But the commute to the west side is bad from anywhere except the west side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 10:21 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,451,703 times
Reputation: 12318
What do you consider to be cheap? I don't think of Burbank as being that cheap really.

Typical homes 3bed 2 bath seem to go for over $600,000 . I guess it could be viewed as cheap compared to some areas.

Personally I think Burbank is pretty nice and more livable than Silverlake and some of the other areas you mentioned.

You can get to Hollywood and other areas pretty quickly from there too for more nightlife etc

The other nice part is there is a lot of retail and places to eat too including mom and pop places it's not all chains like a lot of people think.

It's reputation as the "boring old suburbs" is out of touch with how it is today at least.

Most people that believe that don't really know the area that well .

It's also very clean and feels safe when you are walking around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2014, 10:23 AM
 
95 posts, read 161,139 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
What do you consider to be cheap? I don't think of Burbank as being that cheap really.

Typical homes 3bed 2 bath seem to go for over $600,000 . I guess it could be viewed as cheap compared to some areas.

Personally I think Burbank is pretty nice and more livable than Silverlake and some of the other areas you mentioned.

You can get to Hollywood and other areas pretty quickly from there too for more nightlife etc

The other nice part is there is a lot of retail and places to eat too including mom and pop places it's not all chains like a lot of people think.

It's reputation as the "boring old suburbs" is out of touch with how it is today at least.

Most people that believe that don't really know the area that well .

It's also very clean and feels safe when you are walking around.
I saw a few newer condos around $450,000 for over 1,000 sq ft. They would be double the price in West Hollywood, and triple in Beverly Hills. For single family homes, those $600k homes would probably be double in the Hills. The difference in price just seems a bit extreme for an area that's safe and I am still suspicious as to why that is.

I get that it is not as convenient or have that "trendy" and "cool" factor that many people in L.A. concern themselves with, but even homes in boring Calabasas that take an hour to drive to West Hollywood cost more.

Is there a big jail or something weird in the area that keeps prices down like this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2014, 10:24 AM
 
95 posts, read 161,139 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelopez2 View Post
Bad commute into DTLA, Century City, Santa Monica, Culver City, so yes there is a studio there, but there are more higher paying jobs in the basin. People don't want to drive so they pay more to live in the basin.

I don't know how familiar you are with the 101S, but it sucks throughout the day.
When you say bad commute, do you mean an hour or more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2014, 01:10 PM
 
96 posts, read 170,452 times
Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgermaine View Post
I saw a few newer condos around $450,000 for over 1,000 sq ft. They would be double the price in West Hollywood, and triple in Beverly Hills. For single family homes, those $600k homes would probably be double in the Hills. The difference in price just seems a bit extreme for an area that's safe and I am still suspicious as to why that is.

I get that it is not as convenient or have that "trendy" and "cool" factor that many people in L.A. concern themselves with, but even homes in boring Calabasas that take an hour to drive to West Hollywood cost more.

Is there a big jail or something weird in the area that keeps prices down like this?
No, there is no "big jail". $600k for a 1200 sq. ft. house built in 1950 that needs remodeling is still a lot of money.

Like others have said, it's harder to get to the west side or western parts of the basin from Burbank (although getting downtown is relatively easier).

To sum it up, these are the reasons:
1. Smaller houses
2. Location if you need to commute to the west side
3. Not "trendy"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2014, 01:12 PM
 
96 posts, read 170,452 times
Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgermaine View Post

I get that it is not as convenient or have that "trendy" and "cool" factor that many people in L.A. concern themselves with, but even homes in boring Calabasas that take an hour to drive to West Hollywood cost more.
Those boring homes in Calabasas are twice the size of those in Burbank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2014, 08:00 PM
 
Location: SoCal & Mid-TN
2,325 posts, read 2,651,508 times
Reputation: 2874
Burbank is pretty spread out and there are some expensive homes here. Some areas are cheaper than others. The area in the foothills has houses upwards of $2 million, for example. Disney and Warner Bros. are here. Bob Hope lived here (his estate was listed recently - over $20 million). I commute to the westside and it's a pain. But I love the suburban feel of Burbank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top