Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2019, 07:25 AM
 
23,872 posts, read 19,032,760 times
Reputation: 10920

Advertisements

https://www.telegram.com/news/201911...n-plan-in-mass


And here is the full report:


https://www.abettercity.org/assets/i...mber_2019I.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2019, 08:02 AM
 
3,314 posts, read 2,177,480 times
Reputation: 3522
“We have to stop just thinking about fixing what we have,” Dimino told the News Service. “We have to pivot to thinking about making sure we fix what we have but also thinking about the next wave of investments we need to make in our transportation system.”


This is the problem I see. Baker is always talking about X amount of $ being thrown at XYZ to keep it up to how it should have been running if it was running good. There is never talk about the next step. We can't talk about the future and new investments when we don't even have nearly enough to keep it running 75% how how it was currently designed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2019, 10:46 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,327 posts, read 39,741,899 times
Reputation: 21406
I see South Station expansion, but no North-South Rail Link. Is that supposed to be rolled into one of the other items? How is MBTA Commuter Rail to turn into rapid transit like frequencies with the bottlenecks that massive interlockings and turnarounds at two different large stations supposed to work out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 04:06 AM
 
24,573 posts, read 18,430,540 times
Reputation: 40277
Those upgrades aren’t going to impact the issue that 128 and 495 are saturated. There are more jobs on the ring roads than in Boston/Cambridge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 04:53 AM
 
2,367 posts, read 1,807,720 times
Reputation: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
Those upgrades aren’t going to impact the issue that 128 and 495 are saturated. There are more jobs on the ring roads than in Boston/Cambridge.
Not really, if anything 128 can get really busy because people are trying to drive into the city instead of using public transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 11:55 AM
 
15,850 posts, read 20,687,924 times
Reputation: 21040
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesmaybe View Post
Not really, if anything 128 can get really busy because people are trying to drive into the city instead of using public transportation.
There's also plenty of business in the Peabody to Waltham stretch along 128/95. That road is a parking lot every day and it's noticeable in the evening commute that the lost lane right at I-93 headed northbound does contribute a bit to the bottle neck, in addition the inefficient cloverleaf at I95/I93 junction. I've frequently headed I93 north during the AM rush and say in traffic with cars looking to exit to I95 for 30 mins. I've found it quicker to just take backroads along I-95 now (129/62/38/etc)

Adding a lane to I-95/I93 in strategic areas, and improving the I93/I95 interchange could potentially make a significant difference in traffic congestion north of the city. Of course, that's based on my informal, "sitting in traffic" study conducted over 12 years of commuting along I-95.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
13,018 posts, read 22,203,750 times
Reputation: 14220
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeePee View Post
This is the problem I see. Baker is always talking about X amount of $ being thrown at XYZ to keep it up to how it should have been running if it was running good. There is never talk about the next step. We can't talk about the future and new investments when we don't even have nearly enough to keep it running 75% how how it was currently designed.
I don't know about that.
  • His administration has pushed the complete fleet replacements on the Red/Orange Line which not only helps prevent breakdowns, it increases capacity on either line. Drastically so on the Orange which is almost unusable at inner stations at peak times.
  • The track and signal upgrades on each line are for better service with fewer issues.
  • They also brought the Green Line Exension (GLX) back from the dead and that's well on its way.
  • They pushed through the new Green Line vehicle procurement.
  • They funded and began construction on South Coast Rail.
  • They're actively looking into expanding the Blue Line.
  • They've embraced the most drastic long-term transit improvement plan I've seen in my lifetime.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonMike7 View Post
There's also plenty of business in the Peabody to Waltham stretch along 128/95. That road is a parking lot every day and it's noticeable in the evening commute that the lost lane right at I-93 headed northbound does contribute a bit to the bottle neck, in addition the inefficient cloverleaf at I95/I93 junction. I've frequently headed I93 north during the AM rush and say in traffic with cars looking to exit to I95 for 30 mins. I've found it quicker to just take backroads along I-95 now (129/62/38/etc)

Adding a lane to I-95/I93 in strategic areas, and improving the I93/I95 interchange could potentially make a significant difference in traffic congestion north of the city. Of course, that's based on my informal, "sitting in traffic" study conducted over 12 years of commuting along I-95.
But the problem will always be that it's really just not possible to significantly increase traffic capacity and improve traffic flow on urban and suburban highways. And even if you can, induced demand generally leads to the new capacity being exceeded again in relatively short order. That's not to say there shouldn't be an effort to improve 128/95 (I think that's in the comprehensive plan), but the reality is that we're not going to solve the traffic problem by trying to adding more lanes and capacity. The solution is to create viable alternatives that get cars off the road. That said, some sort of ring transit along 128 (even a bus) would help. Interested to see what's proposed for alleviating that because it can't be ignored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 01:22 PM
 
24,573 posts, read 18,430,540 times
Reputation: 40277
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
That said, some sort of ring transit along 128 (even a bus) would help. Interested to see what's proposed for alleviating that because it can't be ignored.

That was my point and it's both 128 and 495 these days. If you work in Boston, you have public transportation alternatives. If you work in one of the jillion office parks on the inner and outer ring roads, it's a car commute with no viable alternative. There is 125 million square feet of office space on 128 and 495. There are people here who think all jobs can be accessed via commuter rail and the T.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Dripping Springs, Texas
162 posts, read 103,299 times
Reputation: 416
"Business group calls for $50 billion transportation plan in Mass."

Let me re-phrase that for you.

"Business group calls for $50 billion transportation plan within a 10 or 15 mile radius of Boston and the other 325 towns and cities in the Commonwealth can get jack...."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 03:06 PM
 
Location: New England
1,064 posts, read 1,428,006 times
Reputation: 1853
As always, it is "Business group calls for $50 billion transportation plan in Mass and doesn't say a word about how it's going to be paid for".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top