So can we expect more migrants being dropped off at hotels? (Boston: money, building)

[WestieWhitie]

Originally Posted by htfdcolt

I don't have to respond to fantasy . You have YET to show one iota of evidence of any migrant being "fast tracked" to voter status. Allegations and assumptions are cheap, bro.

Well then amigo, if you insist we're not sending the "asylum jefe asylum" herd to the ballot box do you agree that we should send them back home?

[timberline742]

Originally Posted by htfdcolt

Just like a "wall" is not a policy either, it's a means of enforcement.

Eh, more like a means of funneling more money into the pockets of criminal organizations.

[bostongymjunkie]

Except, with every other nation and with the homes of virtually every elite power broker in this country, a wall is merely a security measure designed to delay entry of unauthorized people until the appropriate personnel can respond. Nothing more, nothing less. Here, it's used as political fodder for virtue-signalling Marxists who only like walls that prevent people from leaving a place they control.

[htfdcolt]

Originally Posted by bostongymjunkie

Except, with every other nation and with the homes of virtually every elite power broker in this country, a wall is merely a security measure designed to delay entry of unauthorized people until the appropriate personnel can respond. Nothing more, nothing less. Here, it's used as political fodder for virtue-signalling Marxists who only like walls that prevent people from leaving a place they control.

Huh? It wasn't political until 2015. I recall a certain candidate who opened his rallies with "Build that Wall", and made it almost the entire cornerstone of his campaign. That guy's the Marxist? OK

[htfdcolt]

Originally Posted by WestieWhitie

Well then amigo, if you insist we're not sending the "asylum jefe asylum" herd to the ballot box do you agree that we should send them back home?

Geesh, there's no in-between? You realize there are 14 million perfectly legal US residents who can't vote because they're not citizens? They're called lawful permanent residents. Maybe that's too sophisticated a concept, or would detract from the polarization you're trying to create by screaming about importing voters.

[bostongymjunkie]

Originally Posted by htfdcolt

Huh? It wasn't political until 2015. I recall a certain candidate who opened his rallies with "Build that Wall", and made it almost the entire cornerstone of his campaign. That guy's the Marxist? OK

You're right. It wasn't political until the wrong candidate proposed it. It had been discussed by members of both parties prior. Portions of the border had been using barriers for years. Once it became a cornerstone of someone's campaign, it miraculously became a weapon of zenophobia, an outlandish proposal, and has been fodder for "progressives" and their corporate-media dividers ever since. What, again, is zenophobic about a sovereign nation using a standard and widely-used security measure to help protect its borders? Border walls are used around the world.

[WestieWhitie]

Originally Posted by htfdcolt

Geesh, there's no in-between? You realize there are 14 million perfectly legal US residents who can't vote because they're not citizens? They're called lawful permanent residents. Maybe that's too sophisticated a concept, or would detract from the polarization you're trying to create by screaming about importing voters.

Oh good, now you're getting somewhere! Now enlighten us rethuglican repugnicans, what is stopping the asylum jefe, asylum herd you just converted into lawful permanent residents from converting their tarjeta verde into a pasaporte and heading straight to the polls?

[Trekker99]

Originally Posted by WestieWhitie

That, my friend, is a small price to pay for ensuring rethuglican repugnicans never win again and we have centered green new trans racial gender equitable thermal equity justice for all!

Mind if I use this? It's spot on.

[bostongymjunkie]

I think you really need to be naive or tone deaf to believe that the Dem immigration policy isn't connected to political opportunism. Not only is it obvious given their lack of interest in enforcing the law but they allude to their political agenda all the time. It doesn't make headlines and it's generally subtle, but it's there. I mean the aversion to voter ID, the willful failure to enforce immigration laws, the refusal to compromise amongst themselves, it's completely obvious. That's just the electoral agenda. I believe there is another hidden agenda among both certain Dems and certain Republicans to enable the continued importation of cheap, slave labor to advance the interets of their corporate masters. I mean here's one example. There are many others, but I think you really need to be a complete Kool-Aid drinker to not see what's going on here. Either that or you do get it and have no loyalty to the country.None of these fools have any regard for either immigrants or the interests and people of the United States. Their agenda is about political power and money.



https://youtu.be/-cTFzUezEyo

[msRB311]

This feels like terrorism to some. Our country is literally being invaded with poor homeless people who are looking for money and who know what trouble they will cause.