Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I see no problem with either one of them lasting for more then 10 years easily, both of those cars are half the price of a Lexus, sorry over priced Toyota. I personally like the looks of the 3 better. And I would get the four wheel drive.
Location: Danbury CT covering all of Fairfield County
2,637 posts, read 7,427,019 times
Reputation: 1378
I found the leg room backseat of the CX3 incredibly small when I sat the drivers seat from myself (6'1). I didn't think I could fit another adult in the back, even though 99% of the time it's just me driving. I didn't even test drive it the 3, went with the 5
The CX-3 is an entry level CUV, based off the Mazda 2 platform. The CX-5, currently Mazda’s best selling vehicle, is based off the larger Mazda 3.
I bought a left over 2018 CX-5 Grand Touring since I needed the swiveling headlights to see better in the dark. The 2017 model revision went upmarket and added more sound insulation and a more comfortable ride.
I’m happy with 2018, although I would have preferred the 2019 models that come with Android auto & Apple CarPlay. Gas mileage also decreased slightly due to the additional weight.
I considered more practical CUVs such as the Subaru Forrester and the Toyota RAV 4, that are either more fuel efficient or hold far more cargo than the CX-5. However, I didn’t want the CVT transmission in the Subaru or have a RAV-4 which are nice, but a dime a dozen.
Obviously, it will depend on the trim level you choose. The lowest end Sport CX-5 FWD starts at around $25,000. The top-notch Signature, which includes AWD and all available options, is a tick under $37,000. The lowest end Sport CX-3 FWD starts at just over $20,000 and the Grand Touring AWD starts at just over $27,000. Add the available premium package and you're looking at $29,000.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluewin888
Under normal drive, it can last 10 years ?
I drove my 2004 Mazda3 for 15 years, almost to the date, and accumulated 233,000 miles. By far the best car I've ever had the pleasure of owning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluewin888
How the quality comparing to Lexus UX /NX?
My intention once my 3 finally gave up was to "move up" in the auto world into a Lexus NX. I test drove a top-end NX F-Sport and then the CX-5 immediately afterward. Other than "needing" a Lexus in one's driveway and proven reliability, I can't fathom why anyone would choose the NX over the CX-5. The NX was a very small vehicle with a super cramped rear seat. I liked the interior materials and design for the most part, but it is intended for small people. Period. The ride was compliant and it was very quiet. The CX-5 I test drove at the time was a GT because the GT-R and Signature were not yet available. I found the GT to be more spacious, the interior materials just as good (not better, necessarily) and better looking. I don't think it was quite as quiet on the highway, but then we're comparing a non-luxury brand with a luxury brand. I think that says something about the perception of Mazda's current lineup.
I had a 2018 CX-3 GT as a loaner last year and found it to be nice, but very tight. Another vehicle intended for smaller individuals. The ride is firm, but not harsh, and the materials are certainly class-competitive. I see quite a number of them in my area, so there is definitely a market for a smaller utility vehicle.
Location: In a perfect world winter does not exist
3,657 posts, read 2,937,139 times
Reputation: 6739
Take the 5, there is just not enough room in the 3. I can't imagine being happy riding in the 3 across the country.
Car makers have been making cars too small while America is getting bigger. Go figure.
We considered the Lexus a 2017 nx200, but it took premium fuel and for the same money used I could get a brand new 2019 CX-5 Touring edition. That's what we did end up doing and paid $27309. My wife's Forester was leaking coolant and tranny fluid. The wheels were coming loose even though I torqued them to 90lbs. The trade in came to $4000, which was OK for us.
The CX-3 is an entry level CUV, based off the Mazda 2 platform. The CX-5, currently Mazda’s best selling vehicle, is based off the larger Mazda 3.
The CX-5 is quite a bit different from the CX-3. The CX-5 is not exactly based off the Mazda3, as stated above. It's based off a larger platform, sort of a hybrid of the Mazda3 and Mazda6.
As many have said, the CX-3 is pretty small and cramped, being based of the tiny Mazda2. It was Mazda's first attempt at the sub-compact SUV market, and I think they admit it's not their best effort.
What you really should be considering is the all-new CX-30. This is based off the redesigned Mazda3 platform, and is a much better sub-compact SUV than the CX-3 is.
The CX-5 is a fantastic vehicle, and you can't go wrong with it. But if you want something smaller/cheaper, consider the CX-30.
As to the OP's other question, yes a Lexus will probably have better 10-year-plus reliability. But a Mazda will easily last you 10 years, and simply based on reliability, you will not come out ahead paying the $$ premium for the Lexus.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
