Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am sure this as been asked time after time.....sorry...
But..........
With excellent credit, are there other options besides FHA, to get a loan with 3.5% down on a home? Not a first time buyer and we make too much to qualify for a USDA loan.
FHA is not out of the question, its just we would like to spend more than the FHA loan limit on a home.
I am sure this as been asked time after time.....sorry...
But..........
With excellent credit, are there other options besides FHA, to get a loan with 3.5% down on a home? Not a first time buyer and we make too much to qualify for a USDA loan.
FHA is not out of the question, its just we would like to spend more than the FHA loan limit on a home.
There sure are better options.......80/15/5. But you don't say how high you want to go, you can only do the 80/15/5 with a conforming first trust (417). That would put you around a 521K sales price.
There sure are better options.......80/15/5. But you don't say how high you want to go, you can only do the 80/15/5 with a conforming first trust (417). That would put you around a 521K sales price.
Why pay that much mortgage insurance?
This would be a great option! Thank you. We are looking at $400K. So, this would work.
Not every broker or lender does 80/15/5 anymore. You might need to shop it. Plus. the rates for the second 15% are higher and usually end up costing more the then PMI... however, if you plan on paying the 15% off in a shorter period of time than it takes to get PMI taken off, then there is an advantage.
Not every broker or lender does 80/15/5 anymore. You might need to shop it. Plus. the rates for the second 15% are higher and usually end up costing more the then PMI... however, if you plan on paying the 15% off in a shorter period of time than it takes to get PMI taken off, then there is an advantage.
Yeah, I looked into that and it was really hard to find a lender that did 80/15/5, and even then it didn't really seem better, as even the interest on the 80% was higher than the interest rate on FHA, plus the very high interest on the 15%.
Even compared to a 5% down conventional there wasn't much difference because the interest rate for the FHA was lower and the 5% down conventional still had PMI (albeit less than FHA).
The rates on the 2nd trust aren't pretty, but the payments are lower than FHA every single time. I just ran a comparison (FHA vs. 80/15/5) for a buyer on a 471K sales price and the difference in payment was a hair under $400 a month, yet the additional cash (1.5%) required was made up in the first year of payments.
Did you compare the 80/15/5 to an FHA with 5% down? Comparing a 3.5% down loan to a 5% down loan isn't really apples to apples.
Besides, 1.5% of $471K is $7,065. $400 x 12 months is $4,800, so not sure where that other $2,265 went to.
But what about once you eliminate the MIP? I was also looking at the long-term. Everyone would tell me "no one stays with the same loan for 30 years," but if interest rates increase or don't go much lower then there shouldn't be a reason to re-finance if you're able to eliminate the MIP after the 5-year minimum. Since the FHA interest rate is lower, I think I'd rather have a lower payment for the last 20-25 years than the first 5-8. The fact that an FHA loan is assumable also provides a hedge which can be a selling point in case the interest rates do go up also doesn't hurt.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.