Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2010, 02:19 PM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,392,786 times
Reputation: 18729

Advertisements

The courts in my neck of the woods have seen more than a few prosecutions of folks that have defrauded lenders. With electronic recording of deeds and liens it does not take much effort for a lender to gather evidence that a borrower is not occupying a property. If the borrower is a seamster it is no wonder that the lender wants a criminal conviction to scare off others.

The OP on this thread seems kinda unaware that the higher fees / rates for non-owner occupied properties are there due to higher risks. With people still looking to "sneak by" with an owner occupied loan on an investment property it is no wonder that many lenders have severely clamped down on all loans...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2010, 03:09 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,142,209 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by nostlost View Post
If the rates and fees are higher for an investment property, can't you just say it will be owner occupied? Besides bending the truth it seems that there wouldn't be many ways they could disprove what you said.
We have borrowers sign an occupancy certificate where they have to indicate what type of occupancy the property will have. It states in bold that mortgage fraud is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to 30 year in federal prison or $1,000,000 fine or both.

So, probably not worth it. Plus a good lender will be able to figure out your intentions and catagorize it properly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2010, 06:14 AM
 
Location: MID ATLANTIC
8,674 posts, read 22,922,371 times
Reputation: 10517
Uh, hate to be the party pooper, but occupancy fraud is the number one fraud offense in mortgage crime. It would be counter intuitive for me to share how the buyer is caught and one would only compound their stupidity by thinking occupancy won't be checked. But I will tell you residential mortgage fraud is now being prosecuted as a federal class E felony. If it can be proven the loan officer or realtor was aware of the fraud, jump to the front of the line as a class 1 felony and conspiracy charges.

Giving bad advice, encouraging someone to commit a crime online, should also be a crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2010, 07:17 PM
 
2 posts, read 22,255 times
Reputation: 11
Default Can we get Lower Rate for Higher Down Payment?

From my research the below seems to be an accurate statement. I was wondering if we can get a better rate or fewer Points with a higher Down Payment, say like 50%?


Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewSoss View Post
Okay, here's the deal with investment properties.

Assuming it's a single family (1 unit) not a duplex or triplex, etc..

You can get rates similar to what you can get on an owner occupied property, but the fees are significantly higher.

The 'hit' (additional fee) for an investment property with 25%+ down is 1.75% of the loan amount. If you are only putting 20% down, it's 3.00%!, so that extra 5% would be prudent.

You used to be able to take a higher rate to offset the increased fees, but a couple things have happened.
First off, the fees were greatly increased last fall. They used to be about .50% - 1.00% depending on down payment.
Secondly, the amount that you have to increase the rate to offset the fees are obsurd due to what is called 'stack compression'.

It's a fancy way of saying lenders aren't giving as much credit for an increased rate as they used to.

How it works when you are taking an increased rate is that the entity who is purchasing the mortgage pays a broker/loan officer a premium for delivering a higher than market interest rate. The broker then uses this premium to offset the various 'hits' (investment, credit score, low downpayment, etc..) so that the borrower doesn't have to pay high fees (or it at least gives the borrower an option to pay fees and get a lower rate or not pay fees and take the higher rate).

There are two ways to look at this:
a) it's difficult for people to obtain high rate, low fees financing
b) it's cheaper than it used to be to buy down to a lower rate

With 25% down, and good credit, you should be able to get a 30 year fixed at around 5% with around 2pts. 4.5% would probably be around 3pts.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2010, 07:26 AM
 
Location: MID ATLANTIC
8,674 posts, read 22,922,371 times
Reputation: 10517
As it's been suggested, lenders have a matrix of the add-ons (and credits) for various lending situations. With 25% down on a non-owner occupied property, the add-on is 1.75% (points). The maximum credit for a low LTV (60%) and credit score is .25 for a net add-on of 1.50% add-on. The other common variables in determining cost include: length of lock, state (for some investors), escrow waiver, high rise condo, or condo over 75% LTV. Your lender may vary slightly.

With it not yet certain real estate is an appreciating asset, many financial advisors will not recommend 50+% be put down on an investment property (of course certain situations are exceptions). Once the home is bought, it's very difficult to get that cash back out of the property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 07:50 PM
 
1 posts, read 3,394 times
Reputation: 10
I didn't "Bend the truth" on an investment property recently and it cost me dearly. Northwest Community Credit Union and all agents involved put my wife and I through the ringer. My dad commited suicide so I came home from overseas and started to purchase his home to keep my mother off the street and their home out of forclosure. My little brother was in an accident and lost his right arm to boot and I was told I could purchase the house with 3 % down at 4.25% intrest. Long story short they told me that beings as my dad and I were related I didn't qualify for the loan because we might be scamming the system. They said I could buy the house at 5.25% with 20% down. I came up with the 20% down and they then told me that beings as I was buying the house with the intent to let my mom live there (which they knew from the beginning) it was an Investment piece so my rate would now be 7% intrest with 20% down. With no time extensions left for the short sale, i had to take what they gave me. My insurance also went up. They all commented on how rare it was for a young couple to be so honest to do things right. Their commpliments felt more like a kiss on the neck as they bent me over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2011, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Ridgewood NJ
592 posts, read 2,188,055 times
Reputation: 316
Here's a honest question for the pros, do lenders really care as long as you make your payment on time every month?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2011, 08:32 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,142,209 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by gagaliya View Post
Here's a honest question for the pros, do lenders really care as long as you make your payment on time every month?
Yep. I wouldn't do the deal if I thought the borrower was lying on the occupancy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2011, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Plano, Texas
1,673 posts, read 7,019,437 times
Reputation: 697
Yes they do care. Investment loans carry higher risk, so they must have a higher rate to adequately compensate the end investor.

Like Tim above, i wouldnt do a loan for a client i knew that was lying about occupancy either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2011, 07:18 PM
 
Location: The ATL
292 posts, read 635,553 times
Reputation: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by nostlost View Post
If the rates and fees are higher for an investment property, can't you just say it will be owner occupied? Besides bending the truth it seems that there wouldn't be many ways they could disprove what you said.
Lenders are very strict about everything nowadays so it won;t be possible at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top