Nebraska Same-Sex Marriage Ban (Lincoln, Western: home, babysitter, vs)

[Raphael07]

Originally Posted by inged

You conveniently left off the phrase "served by agencies."

Most likely normal people reject the homosexuals, so it would be natural to expect people having to turn to an agency to identify as a much larger percentage than usual.

And people served by agencies don't reflect the homeless population because...? You also just legitimized parents kicking out their kids for being gay. Congratulations. Also, 'normal' people. Enlighten me on normal.

[inged]

Originally Posted by Raphael07

And people served by agencies don't reflect the homeless population because...? You also just legitimized parents kicking out their kids for being gay. Congratulations. Also, 'normal' people. Enlighten me on normal.

I mean normal people would be more likely to give their distant relatives a place to stay, whereas since homosexuality is a mental disorder, people will keep their distance.

[Raphael07]

Originally Posted by inged

I mean normal people would be more likely to give their distant relatives a place to stay, whereas since homosexuality is a mental disorder, people will keep their distance.

Right, because normal people will disown their love for a person because that person just so happens to be attracted to people of the same sex. No. Normal people do not do that. Monsters do that. That very line of thought it the thing that terrifies millions of kids every day. There are so many things wrong with your statement that I cannot even begin to express them.

Gay kids are not the sick ones. Families who disown them are.

[Cowboys fan in Houston]

Originally Posted by inged

No, it was illegal to enter a civil union in 2003. In 2003, you would not be jailed for finding people of the same sex attractive. This is what annoys me about civil union supporters. They exaggerate and twist the past to make it sound like their special interest group is under extreme torture when that never actually happened.

Loving v Virginia should not have occurred either. A heterosexual union that does not produce children is not really a marriage either and once the female reaches infertility, if no children were conceived, the marriage should be dissolved. It's just another thing wrong with our asinine system.

This may be one of the more assinine things Ive ever read.

Im part of a heterosexual marriage. We will never produce children. Why? BECAUSE I HAD CANCER AND AM STERILE.

So by your utterly ridiculous logic, my marriage is worth less than couples that do produce children. Thats whats absurd.

Originally Posted by inged

I mean normal people would be more likely to give their distant relatives a place to stay, whereas since homosexuality is a mental disorder, people will keep their distance.

No, homosexuality is not a metal disorder.

Sexual Orientation

[beasley106]

Originally Posted by inged

Loving v Virginia should not have occurred either.

Why exactly should Loving vs. Virginia not have occurred? Is it because it made inter-racial marriage legal?

Honestly the only credible case you are making here is that you are an intolerant bigot.

[DetroitN8V]

I'd say it's time to quit feeding the troll. There's no way a normal human being thinks the way this inged does.

[inged]

Originally Posted by DetroitN8V

I'd say it's time to quit feeding the troll. There's no way a normal human being thinks the way this inged does.

I do though. I never post something I don't think to be true and never censor myself just because someone might not like it.

[inged]

Originally Posted by beasley106

Why exactly should Loving vs. Virginia not have occurred? Is it because it made inter-racial marriage legal?

Honestly the only credible case you are making here is that you are an intolerant bigot.

How many times do you see an inter-racial marriage work?

It rarely happens.

People just like to argue over "rights" to create controversy and then never use them because they never wanted them in the first place.

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by inged

I do though. I never post something I don't think to be true and never censor myself just because someone might not like it.

I'd suggest staying in the cave then and leaving this internet thing to those that can communicate and empathize with other humans. This doesn't seem like the right playground for the mentally ill.

[Minnesota Spring]

Originally Posted by inged

I mean normal people would be more likely to give their distant relatives a place to stay, whereas since homosexuality is a mental disorder, people will keep their distance.

Yikes! I'm thankful that I am not related to you.