I guess we won't see too much more bipartisanship

[JERSEY MAN]

And proud of it. I realize some people are scabs but I am proud to belong to several unions at that. It seems like scabs are trying to take over the country. I'm proud of it, my father was proud of it, my grandfather was proud of it. I didn't realize that some people in this country think anyone who is any union is the bogeyman. They must be related to Sam Walton.

[jknic]

In all seriousness, I'd love to exile quire a few people from NJ, Sweeny being one of them.

[Informed Info]

Originally Posted by bradykp

david brooks had a fantastic write-up on this today, that sums it all up. i also listened to something else (the caucus podcast from the nytimes) that spoke about how the dems don't start far enough away from what the republicans want, whereas the republicans start all the way as far as possible. smart negotiation.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/op...s.html?_r=1&hp

Please.

David Brooks, the closet liberal he's always been, is an idiot.

Tell me how cutting spending and raising taxes (or, "increasing revenue") at the same time is going to fix anything?

Who does it benefit?

If you're willing to cut budgets, deal with it. Why does it have to go hand-in-hand with higher taxation(increasing revenue)?

What's the point? Democrats can't just cut a budget? Someone has to pay for it?