Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-22-2015, 04:57 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,947,840 times
Reputation: 11660

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
You should be happy you live in a town with that much retail. Where I live in West Orange we don't have much retail and that puts a higher tax burden on residents. We had residents bending over backwards to fight a friggin' Quick Check from coming into town. People are so clueless. They fight this stuff but then will complain that the town doesn't attract businesses to ease the tax burden. Everyone wants retail...unless it's within a 10 block radius of their home...then it's no good...
It will still be higher tax burden on residents in a way because it is the locals who will spend money there. Its not a tax burden but you still need to spend the money in order to keep those businesses in business or they close down and you are back to square one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2015, 05:05 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,947,840 times
Reputation: 11660
Quote:
Originally Posted by newdude05 View Post
There is no mystery, it's not just the quantity but also the type of retail. You can have 100 small mom and pop stores that wont do much for tax revenue vs 1 popular large chain store like walmart, bed bath beyond etc... Look at edgewater, paramus, secaucus..etc all with multiple popular large stores, and those towns all have the lowest taxes (by comparison to rest of NJ). Meanwhile look at ridgewood and montclair which also has large amount of shopping, but all mostly mom and pop small stores, and their taxes are still very high.

Of course how much the town spends on schools etc..also matters. But in general, towns with many large scale department/chain stores always have lower tax rates.
Don't those towns also have poorer residents too? The poor people cant afford anything other than the big box stores whom they probably also work for in some form or another, and don't get paid much by them. It is a never ending cycle.


The rich people can afford more novelty things, and that is the only kind of mom and pop that can compete against the big box.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 05:20 PM
 
19,128 posts, read 25,331,967 times
Reputation: 25434
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Don't those towns also have poorer residents too? The poor people cant afford anything other than the big box stores whom they probably also work for in some form or another, and don't get paid much by them. It is a never ending cycle.


The rich people can afford more novelty things, and that is the only kind of mom and pop that can compete against the big box.

What you say is true to a great extent, but--on the other hand--I save money by buying some of my weekly food order at Whole Foods. My favorite yogurt--Siggi's--costs ~.40 less per container at Whole Foods than it does at Shop-Rite. Also, the organic Half & Half is about $1.00 less at Whole Foods, as compared to Shop-Rite.

Similarly, my favorite non-cured, non-preservative-laden sliced ham--Applegate Organic--costs $1.25 less per package at WF, as compared to Shop-Rite. Even the house brand 365 mayonnaise at Whole Foods costs $1.00 less than the comparable product at the--supposedly--cheaper Trader Joe's.

Those who think that everything at Whole Foods is more expensive have obviously not done any price comparisons for quite a while. Yes, WF's prepared foods are quite pricey, but if you are shopping for...staple items...in many cases, you can actually save money by going to Whole Foods.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 05:58 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,340,269 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Would it be better if that property just sat empty?
According to suburban NIMBYs, yes. Then they wonder why their kids and grandkids are in Brooklyn. They don't realize that the suburbs have basically made modern living illegal. Very few people under the age of 50 want a high maintenance older property on a big suburban lot, with high taxes and far from services.

The things people actually want today (walkability, mixed-use, etc.) are basically illegal under Parsippany zoning. They're still living in 1970.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 06:26 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,213,191 times
Reputation: 10895
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
According to suburban NIMBYs, yes. Then they wonder why their kids and grandkids are in Brooklyn. They don't realize that the suburbs have basically made modern living illegal. Very few people under the age of 50 want a high maintenance older property on a big suburban lot, with high taxes and far from services.
The housing market says otherwise. If you like a 350sqft apartment in a rowhouse on a 12x50 lot next to the Gowanus Canal, feel free to move there.

Last edited by nybbler; 11-22-2015 at 06:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 07:01 PM
 
Location: NJ
4,940 posts, read 12,146,620 times
Reputation: 4562
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
The housing market says otherwise. If you like a 350sqft apartment in a rowhouse on a 12x50 lot next to the Gowanus Canal, feel free to move there.
I agree, there was a time when I didn't mind living in a 500 square foot apartment. But then I got married, and had 2 kids. No more apartment living for me. Half the people in my West Orange neighborhood moved out of Brooklyn and other parts of the city for this reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 08:09 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,340,269 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
The housing market says otherwise. If you like a 350sqft apartment in a rowhouse on a 12x50 lot next to the Gowanus Canal, feel free to move there.
Uh, actually no. Sprawly areas like Parsippany are dirt-cheap compared to more urban and transit-oriented areas. Let me guess, you are one of those NIMBYs that thinks that Parsippany benefits from blocking Whole Foods and townhouses, in the misguided view that development lowers property values?

Anything near the Gowanus Canal is much more desirable than anything near Parsippany, hence the much higher prices. A two bedroom condo near the Gowanus will start around $1 million these days. In Parsippany, $1 million basically buys you a mansion. Forty years ago, the opposite was true. That's why people are so befuddled at why their property values are lagging, and why their kids and grandkids are living somewhere else. They don't get it.

The fastest appreciating real estate in NJ is in walkable, transit-oriented, denser, mixed use communities like Hoboken, Montclair, Summit, etc. That's what people want these days. The lagging real estate is in places like Parsippany. People want rail, downtowns, multifamily housing, etc. They don't want acre lots and highways and no sidewalks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 08:16 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,340,269 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
I agree, there was a time when I didn't mind living in a 500 square foot apartment. But then I got married, and had 2 kids. No more apartment living for me. Half the people in my West Orange neighborhood moved out of Brooklyn and other parts of the city for this reason.
You're contradicting yourself. You could only afford a 500 square foot apartment in Brooklyn, and can afford far more in West Orange. That's exactly my point.

The people in your West Orange neighborhood moved there because it was more affordable. 30 years ago, Brooklyn was more affordable than West Orange. People moved to NJ because they got a promotion and had more money to spend. Now they move to NJ because they can't afford Brooklyn.

West Orange is a somewhat urban suburb, though, which means property values are probably a good long-term bet. At least there's some transit and walkability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Earth
7,643 posts, read 6,478,770 times
Reputation: 5828
I still say move patel bros. there. More parking!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2015, 01:08 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,213,191 times
Reputation: 10895
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Uh, actually no. Sprawly areas like Parsippany are dirt-cheap compared to more urban and transit-oriented areas.
Certainly cheaper per square foot. But the ridiculous idea that no one under the age of 50 wants to live in the suburbs is belied by the fact that houses are still selling for around $400k; there aren't enough over-50s to drive the prices up that high.


Quote:
Let me guess, you are one of those NIMBYs that thinks that Parsippany benefits from blocking Whole Foods and townhouses, in the misguided view that development lowers property values?
Naa, I think they're idiots for blocking Whole Foods.


Quote:
Anything near the Gowanus Canal is much more desirable than anything near Parsippany, hence the much higher prices.
It's a bubble, and when it bursts it's going to smell extremely bad

https://goo.gl/maps/E7DBYNjY7SQ2

Quote:
The fastest appreciating real estate in NJ is in walkable, transit-oriented, denser, mixed use communities like Hoboken, Montclair, Summit, etc
East Orange, Paterson... oh, oops, guess not.

Anyway, Montclair and Summit are not transit-oriented; they have transit for the commute, but if you want to get around the town, you mostly drive. Hoboken you mostly walk; it's small. Or swim

Hoboken burst pipe flooding: Water advisory still in effect | NJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top