Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwood Boy
|
Norwood Boy,the national average of people under water is 18.5% so the difference is a whopping 1%.Sorry,but I really don't see any big news here.If 30% or 40% were under water and the national average was only 15% or something it might be meaningful.
Actually,since The Bronx is one of poorest counties in the whole country,I'm kind of surprised that the percentage of people under water
ISN'T significantly higher than the national average.
Also,the story linked has nothing to do with BRONX Real Estate, as you put it, because within The Bronx there are many neighborhoods with healthy markets and relatively few people under water.If you have been following the whole mortgage fiasco thing you should know that the vast majority of underwater Bronx homeowners are in two areas ……Williamsbridge/Wakefield and Throg's Neck.It's been estimated that in those neighborhoods the "underwater rate" actually is 30 to 40%.
Finally,you should also realize that the whole mortgage meltdown nationally had little to do with where people bought their houses or even how much they initially paid for them. The problem came about because people everywhere used their houses as ATM machines and refinanced over and over,taking out more money than the houses were ever worth.The banks were all too willing to play the game.A lot of people who are categorized as "under water" on their mortgages may not really be under water because they already took a boat load of cash out and used it for other things.