Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2017, 12:30 AM
 
Location: Planet Earth
3,921 posts, read 9,129,932 times
Reputation: 1673

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
That's not necessarily a benefit. They say there could be gains, but there might not be. As far as time gained and time lost on individual bases, that's not clear cut either because the ridership on the non-express stop could be higher which means even if the individual riders "lose" less time than those gained by others, you're missing the part where you're multiplying by ridership. Sure, they can give it a test run (though seems like a terrible idea without fixing the Bergen stop's other level first) to check first, but it's much ado about very little overall. The biggest issue is that the F train express they'd be running from Church wouldn't save that much time overall, but would certainly confuse a lot of people. This really won't become useful until there's something akin to a fifth phase of the Second Avenue Subway to Brooklyn.

B to Ocean Parkway every day is a real actual improvement. Small gain for a small price. Also, B train to Stillwell on seasonal weekends is sensible and feasible. The B train is a real express train with long runs between subsequent stops so less time is spent simply accelerating and decelerating, plus it's bi-directional trackage all the way to Ocean Parkway. The F express in the context of a beach express really doesn't net an overall gain of much of anything in terms of getting to the beach quickly. Plus, the Q and this extended service B to Stillwell on weekends, would be the only service that hit all four beach stops so it'd make for a beach shuttle of sorts, too.
I'm not talking about the (F) express in the context of a beach express. I'm just talking about it in general (it happens to go to Coney Island, so it's somewhat relevant, but even for the stops between Neptune & Church I think they warrant express service).

In any case, they say 48% of riders will gain 3.4 minutes, while 52% of riders will lose 1.3 minutes. Doing some quick math, 0.48*3.4 = 1.632, whereas 0.52*-1.3 = -0.676, and then you multiply those coefficients by the daily ridership at the times of day when the express runs to get the passenger-minutes saved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Yes, I saw that. It might be that the diamond crossover is too far out from Ocean Parkway so that the effective switching time is too long--I heard that's the case somewhere further out in Queens on the IND Queens Boulevard line. Hopefully that's not the case as the two stations are about half a mile from each other.
The station is Jamaica Center on the (E) wasn't planned to be a permanent terminal (the (E) was supposed to be extended east). That's the reason that some (E) trains go to 179th during rush hour, which has a lot more capacity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2017, 06:19 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21252
Quote:
Originally Posted by checkmatechamp13 View Post
I'm not talking about the (F) express in the context of a beach express. I'm just talking about it in general (it happens to go to Coney Island, so it's somewhat relevant, but even for the stops between Neptune & Church I think they warrant express service).

In any case, they say 48% of riders will gain 3.4 minutes, while 52% of riders will lose 1.3 minutes. Doing some quick math, 0.48*3.4 = 1.632, whereas 0.52*-1.3 = -0.676, and then you multiply those coefficients by the daily ridership at the times of day when the express runs to get the passenger-minutes saved.



The station is Jamaica Center on the (E) wasn't planned to be a permanent terminal (the (E) was supposed to be extended east). That's the reason that some (E) trains go to 179th during rush hour, which has a lot more capacity.
It's a fine idea to try to run the F express. I don't think it'll end up netting people much and the confusion it'd introduce will probably outweigh the time savings that less than half the ridership would get, but it's worth a shot since the equipment is there. For going all the way to Neptune, you're talking about peak direction only kind of express, right? I'm pretty sure that's not in the cards right now.

Yes, that's the stop I was thinking of. I think it's likely the diamond crossover would need to be built close to the Ocean Parkway stop instead for this to function, but I'm not actually sure since the B train doesn't run with great frequency anyhow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 08:06 AM
 
912 posts, read 1,132,268 times
Reputation: 1569
Quote:
Originally Posted by checkmatechamp13 View Post
I'm not talking about the (F) express in the context of a beach express. I'm just talking about it in general (it happens to go to Coney Island, so it's somewhat relevant, but even for the stops between Neptune & Church I think they warrant express service).

In any case, they say 48% of riders will gain 3.4 minutes, while 52% of riders will lose 1.3 minutes. Doing some quick math, 0.48*3.4 = 1.632, whereas 0.52*-1.3 = -0.676, and then you multiply those coefficients by the daily ridership at the times of day when the express runs to get the passenger-minutes saved.



The station is Jamaica Center on the (E) wasn't planned to be a permanent terminal (the (E) was supposed to be extended east). That's the reason that some (E) trains go to 179th during rush hour, which has a lot more capacity.
F express service harms more people than it helps. Period. End of story. Stop trying to rationalize it by suggesting that the fewer people it helps will save more time. That is a ridiculous argument, considering that at the end of day, more people willl see their commute lengthed. And you conviently ignore the MTA's own findings that the additional merger and dividing might cancel out anytime savings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2017, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,710,417 times
Reputation: 6098
The bottom line is, there are a lot of people boarding the F on the local stops in Brooklyn. And unless you can run express trains without interfering with local train frequency (which you can't) it makes no sense to run express. Same with the N train, the south Brooklyn neighborhoods it runs through are experiencing population growth (mostly Chinese).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top