Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2020, 06:59 PM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,572,535 times
Reputation: 3714

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimilove View Post
I don’t know about men and women with no kids or non-pregnant but in NY illegal immigrants who are pregnant women or women with children definitely can get Medicaid. My mom owned a hair salon and two women who worked there were on food stamps and Medicaid among whatever else they qualified for. One even had her 3rd child, still here as an illegal immigrant and there was no way she paid a hospital on her nail tech salary. She had government assistance.

Just checked the website here it is.

Attachment 218298
Not exactly what it says. Pregnant illegal immigrants can get medicaid "for emergency services "... And think about it, the child is about to be a US citizen, you can pay for their emergency Medicaid now during gestation or pay for it for the rest of their lives if there's a problem that goes undiagnosed

The rest of it does not say that illegal immigrants can get Medicaid. It says it won't impact an adjustment of status applications (though now, it probably will).

Even if your mother's cousins brothers plumber says otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2020, 07:22 PM
 
15,678 posts, read 15,842,416 times
Reputation: 22211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeran View Post
After a battle that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Trump administration put the so-called public charge rule into effect Monday. It allows the government to deny legal permanent residency to many immigrants who have received public benefits.

Critics say it's a wealth test aimed at weeding out those who rely on federal assistance.
Funny, considering that Trump's own great-grandparents supposedly had no money when they arrived in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2020, 10:56 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 16,125,588 times
Reputation: 11663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeran View Post
Woah. Good idea or bad? Hmmm...

https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs...2s4Gpe2XHnucUc

After a battle that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Trump administration put the so-called public charge rule into effect Monday. It allows the government to deny legal permanent residency to many immigrants who have received public benefits.

Critics say it's a wealth test aimed at weeding out those who rely on federal assistance.
No good in keeping those immigrants that cannot support themselves and rely on tax payers. If you want to come here, you need to offer something. Politicians who need votes can use these people dependency on welfare to ensure their complacency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 08:58 AM
 
1,952 posts, read 1,318,014 times
Reputation: 2490
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
The law doesn't make the distinction between legal and illegal. There are many legal immigrants who aren't yet permanent residents for.whom this could affect


Illegal immigrants: someone who is present in the United states without explicit permission or status granted by the United states citizenship and immigration services.


Legal non immigrant: someone who is present in the united states with the explicit permission of the United States Immigration and services or a United states embassy or consulate abroad. These people may have been granted a Visa (work or visitor) , parole to enter the u.s or refugee or Asylee status.

The public charge rule DOES NOT AFFECT someone who is in the U.S as a refugee or asylee or victim of trafficking.

Someone who is in the u.s on a work visa doesn't have to worry about this public charge as their employer is required to prove that they will pay them prevailing wages to even get a petition approved to bring them here.

These working individuals are usually adequately/high compensated and extremely, rarely avail themselves of govt benefits as this may jeopardize their employment and employers status to continue importing top talent.

This public charge rule is primarily focused on illegal immigrants who are here and using resources that they shouldn't have been.

I know you are an advocate for the down trodden. But stop disseminating bad info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,478 posts, read 5,759,988 times
Reputation: 6136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
Funny, considering that Trump's own great-grandparents supposedly had no money when they arrived in America.
They also didn't take any taxpayer money, because those programs didn't exists at the time. Everyone who came here had to work or start their own business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 01:15 PM
 
3,960 posts, read 3,631,907 times
Reputation: 2027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
They also didn't take any taxpayer money, because those programs didn't exists at the time. Everyone who came here had to work or start their own business.
This
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Manhattan
8,952 posts, read 4,834,112 times
Reputation: 6009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
Funny, considering that Trump's own great-grandparents supposedly had no money when they arrived in America.
Yeah, but did they receive any public funds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 04:37 PM
 
32,185 posts, read 27,419,683 times
Reputation: 25117
Just to be clear; SCOTUS action only lifted various lower court stays of this rule, nothing has been decided on merits.

Thus now various lawsuits will have to make their way through federal courts challenging DT's administration's interpretation of statues that allowed them to create this new rule.

In other words it ain't over until it's over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top