Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2022, 06:47 PM
 
3,955 posts, read 5,084,307 times
Reputation: 4179

Advertisements

All of NY's Governors and Mayors have put lipstick on the pig that is JFK and LGA, while they remain some of the worst airports in the whole world.

Worse yet, they tout how much better they are now.

Do these people ever actually fly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2022, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,647 posts, read 84,928,808 times
Reputation: 115205
Quote:
Originally Posted by WithDisp View Post
All of NY's Governors and Mayors have put lipstick on the pig that is JFK and LGA, while they remain some of the worst airports in the whole world.

Worse yet, they tout how much better they are now.

Do these people ever actually fly?
They are only just starting with JFK.

Both JFK and LGA are/were terminal projects, not airport projects. And what on earth does the Mayor have to do with it?
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: https://www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2022, 08:00 PM
 
1,052 posts, read 453,729 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
They are only just starting with JFK.

Both JFK and LGA are/were terminal projects, not airport projects. And what on earth does the Mayor have to do with it?
Terminal projects are lipstick on a pig unless something is done with runways and airside infrastructure. JFK has one of the most inefficient airfield arrangements imaginable for an airport of its size. LHR despite being half the land area has higher aircraft operations per hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2022, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,647 posts, read 84,928,808 times
Reputation: 115205
Quote:
Originally Posted by minnomaboidenapolis View Post
Terminal projects are lipstick on a pig unless something is done with runways and airside infrastructure. JFK has one of the most inefficient airfield arrangements imaginable for an airport of its size. LHR despite being half the land area has higher aircraft operations per hour.
I am not disagreeing with you. I am merely pointing out that terminals and runways/infrastructure are entirely different things with decisions as to what is done with them made by different entities for different reasons. It doesn't make sense to say, Oh well, since we can't reconfigure the airside at this time, we might as well let the terminals decay and fall into disrepair.

The business who are the main tenants at JFK; i.e., the airlines, still need to conduct their business.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: https://www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2022, 09:07 AM
 
15,868 posts, read 14,504,042 times
Reputation: 11986
The two can't be completely detached. JFK is land limited, so airside changes could very well effect terminal design. And no one would design a terminal complex for a new airport anything like the way JFK is designed.

In any case terminals 4, 5, 8 are relatively new anyway. And as I said before, an airside redesign could free up a lot of space to expand the footprint for the new terminal 1.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
I am not disagreeing with you. I am merely pointing out that terminals and runways/infrastructure are entirely different things with decisions as to what is done with them made by different entities for different reasons. It doesn't make sense to say, Oh well, since we can't reconfigure the airside at this time, we might as well let the terminals decay and fall into disrepair.

The business who are the main tenants at JFK; i.e., the airlines, still need to conduct their business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top