Quote:
Originally Posted by From157
Well, if the judge and HPD lied during court where they swore to oath, that the landlord is only obligated by law to only fumigate the apartment that has complained...then where has this world come too..
|
Landlords are required to keep their buildings vermin free. How that rolls out on the ground however is another matter.
First everyone please stop using word "fumigate". True fumigation is an extensive and complicated process which requires making a structure air tight/sealing then introducing gas or fumes to exterminate various vermin. Obviously that would be a huge undertaking for even a five or six story apartment building much less anything taller.
If by "fumigation" people mean setting off "roach bombs or fogger" type of things that may work, but you've still got one main issue. Fumes will only get at bugs where air circulates. Thus bugs in walls, cracks, crevices, deep inside furniture or furnishings likely won't be bothered. Ditto for those hiding out in units next door, above or below.
For all vermin infestations obvious solution is to be proactive and exterminate entire building or major areas (such as basements where rats and mice get into a building). But law is sort of funny about this; if one tenant complains about an issue that is what will usually be addressed. If other tenants say they don't have an issue, don't want to be bothered, etc... then it's just the person complaining all by their lonesome.
This is why some tenants in multi-family housing simply pack up and move (if possible) when their apartment has a persistent vermin issue. If other tenants are nasty, don't want to be bothered, etc... a landlord's options are limited. Yes, he can force issue by taking reluctant tenants to court to gain access for extermination, but that is a costly and long process.