Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-06-2021, 07:51 PM
 
16 posts, read 17,834 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

if you look at a map, there are train tracks (two in most places, four in others) that go all the way up to albany. apparently, this did see commuter service until the late 50s with stops in all of the major New York cities on the west bank of the hudson river (tappan, nyack, haverstraw, west point, newburgh, kingston, etc).

these tracks are still there. why the heck aren't they being used today? home values could skyrocket if that side saw commuter service with a connection over the tappan zee or a tunnel under the hudson to connect it with the hudson line. 'metro north' west shore. currently, people have to take ferries over to connect to the east side of the hudson for metro north. what a waste of time when there are tracks are already there. there is always talk about how there should be more rail, but all of this infrastructure already exists!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2021, 07:52 PM
 
93,412 posts, read 124,084,833 times
Reputation: 18273
There are tracks being used, but they aren’t right next to the Hudson River: MNR Map
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2021, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,343,520 times
Reputation: 20828
The line to which the OP refers is commonly known as the "West Shore line", and it has a long and complicated history:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Shore_Railroad

It saw a fair amount of local passenger traffic up until the general meltdown of all passenger service in the late Fifties. and access to Manhattan via ferry service from Weehawken. The Penn-Central merger and the coming of Amtrak brought major changes. Freight formerly handled via he moribund New Haven system and interchanged via Maybrook and Campbell Hall, NY or floated across New York Harbor now moved via Albany, which considerably increased congestion. Safety risks also increase when passenger trains, with higher speeds but more-frequent stops, have to share trackage with up-to-two mile-long, 15,000 ton freights, which take longer to stop, start. and attain normal operating speeds,

As a result, service on the Eastern Shore, both via Metro North and beyond to Albany, is predominately passenger, while that on the West Shore is exclusively for freight.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 04-06-2021 at 08:46 PM.. Reason: F
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2021, 10:20 PM
 
5,303 posts, read 6,187,626 times
Reputation: 5494
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
The line to which the OP refers is commonly known as the "West Shore line", and it has a long and complicated history:

It's now called the "River Subdivision" of the CSX railroad (its current owner) and is strictly for freight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2021, 07:20 AM
 
16 posts, read 17,834 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post
It's now called the "River Subdivision" of the CSX railroad (its current owner) and is strictly for freight.
what a waste! there were 30+ stations on that line! many of station buildings are still there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2021, 08:41 AM
 
5,303 posts, read 6,187,626 times
Reputation: 5494
Why doesn't the new "Mario Cuomo Bridge" (YUK) have a provision for commuter trains? Without a ready means of getting to the east side of the Hudson, commuter trains running on the river division wouldn't make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2021, 11:08 AM
 
16 posts, read 17,834 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post
Why doesn't the new "Mario Cuomo Bridge" (YUK) have a provision for commuter trains? Without a ready means of getting to the east side of the Hudson, commuter trains running on the river division wouldn't make sense.
this was the original plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top