Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:16 AM
 
Location: The 12th State
22,974 posts, read 65,522,515 times
Reputation: 15081

Advertisements

A new law that will go into effect in July means higher unemployment taxes for employers until the state's debt to the federal government is paid off, estimated to be in 2015.

Currently employers pay $84 per employee since the state mis its deadline.
After law goes into effect, they’ll pay $105 per employee in 2014, and $126 in 2015.

Employers face higher taxes with unemployment shift - Gaston Gazette
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2013, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Albemarle, NC and Gaithersburg, MD
113 posts, read 180,850 times
Reputation: 215
This will probably make employers less likely to hire new employees. This comes at a time when jobs are in short supply to begin with. It does not bode well for the NC economy. Anything that results in fewer jobs being created only serves to move NC backwards economically. It is so sad to see such a beautiful state being so badly mismanaged by a few people at the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 07:00 PM
 
136 posts, read 435,691 times
Reputation: 242
Your title is deceptive. The unemployment cut does not mean that employer taxes are rising, the truth is that there are multiple changes being made at the same time, one of which results in a higher payment by employers.

First is a reduction in the current unemployment benefit package. The second is an increase in the unemployment taxes paid by the employers. Whether you agree or disagree with the law, one change is not causing the other. Both changes are made to accelerate the payback of the Federal money that funded extended unemployment benefits.

The stated logic is that paying down the debt sooner is better than later, and that we're in a position to rebuild the unemployment fund for the next downturn instead of coming out of one deficit and potentially facing another. You could debate whether they're being more aggressive than necessary in paying off the debt, or that the unemployed and/or business is bearing too much of the burden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top