Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oklahoma
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2010, 11:29 AM
 
3 posts, read 2,667 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

[SIZE=2]SQ 744 – Education Budget Initiative[/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]Devon[/SIZE][SIZE=2]’s position: Vote NO[/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]This sets a minimum amount the state must spend on K-12 education each year, and it is based on the average amount spent by those states that surround Oklahoma. The problem is that because there is no specific funding source tied to this initiative, it could be funded only by a major tax increase or major reductions in other areas of the state budget. We see neither of those as a viable option. Put simply, this is a bad law, which would bring declines in critical services such as law enforcement, human services, corrections and others. While Devon has always been a strong supporter of education, this initiative is the wrong way to improve our schools. We encourage you to vote no.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=2][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]SQ 744 is being opposed by the Oklahoma State Chamber, the Oklahoma City Chamber and the Tulsa Chamber, plus all of the major labor unions except the teachers union. Additionally, it is opposed by University of Oklahoma President David Boren and Oklahoma State University President Burns Hargis.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=2][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]SQ 752 – Judicial Nominating Commission[/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]Devon[/SIZE][SIZE=2]’s position: Vote YES[/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]This increases the members of Oklahoma’s Judicial Nominating Commission to 15, adding two new at-large slots that must be filled by non-lawyers. It adds a restriction that all non-lawyer members cannot have a lawyer in their immediate family. Currently, lawyers cannot serve on the commission, but the trial bar has circumvented this restriction by putting spouses of trial lawyers on the commission. This state question would eliminate this abuse. In addition, SQ 752 would specify that no more than two at-large members could be from the same political party. We believe this change will bring a bi-partisan layman’s voice to the process of appointing judges. We encourage you to vote yes.[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oklahoma
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top