Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is this a good or bad thing for Oregon?
This law is a Bad Idea! Higher Density housing should be restricted to Portland Only 13 61.90%
This law is a Good Idea! This allows more people to move to Oregon and afford various housing options 8 38.10%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-12-2020, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Oregon Coast
15,417 posts, read 9,059,166 times
Reputation: 20391

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
Yeah, that's not going to happen. Oregon has had building codes even longer than it has had land use planning.
Is there anything in this law that says you can't convert a single family home to a duplex? As I read it, this law gives the green light for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2020, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,676,974 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudy Dayz View Post
Is there anything in this law that says you can't convert a single family home to a duplex? As I read it, this law gives the green light for it.
The building code requires that any project that big requires the whole structure be upgraded to current codes, starting with foundation, seismic, electrical, plumbing, light and ventilation, egress, etc. etc.

There won't be any cheapie projects. The green starts in your wallet, and you better have a wad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2020, 01:43 PM
 
Location: US
628 posts, read 818,584 times
Reputation: 656
So the way I read the new law, if a builder wants to purchase 100 acres of land, are they are not allowed put 400 single family homes in that zone? Do they have to further sub-divide it to accommodate duplex, tri and quadplexes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2020, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,574 posts, read 40,421,118 times
Reputation: 17473
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrishawke View Post
So the way I read the new law, if a builder wants to purchase 100 acres of land, are they are not allowed put 400 single family homes in that zone? Do they have to further sub-divide it to accommodate duplex, tri and quadplexes?
If they want to put up 400 SF homes they can do so. There is no requirement to subdivide it further. In places like LO and West Linn where there is high demand for single family homes that will remain the property of choice.

Now, if a homeowner, 10 years after buying a single-family home decides they want to spend their money and go through the development process to convert a home to a duplex, they can certainly do that if they want. I don't think people realize how much it costs to develop things and the SDC (System Development Charges) generally turn people away. There are firewall codes, SDC charges, separate metering, etc. It is NOT cheap to convert.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2020, 09:43 PM
 
Location: WA
5,439 posts, read 7,733,177 times
Reputation: 8554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverfall View Post
If they want to put up 400 SF homes they can do so. There is no requirement to subdivide it further. In places like LO and West Linn where there is high demand for single family homes that will remain the property of choice.

Now, if a homeowner, 10 years after buying a single-family home decides they want to spend their money and go through the development process to convert a home to a duplex, they can certainly do that if they want. I don't think people realize how much it costs to develop things and the SDC (System Development Charges) generally turn people away. There are firewall codes, SDC charges, separate metering, etc. It is NOT cheap to convert.
I lived in Waco Texas for awhile where there aren't these sorts of single family zoning restrictions, especially in rural areas. It's not a problem.

Upscale subdivisions all have expansive lots and large houses with not a single duplex in sight. Like this example in Waco: https://goo.gl/maps/c8XJzwBsSFk8J4DE8


Downscale subdivisions...often shoehorned in open spaces along main highways or behind factories or strip malls are sometimes made as duplex subdivisions. Like this: https://goo.gl/maps/7ujV7tJRuZUw1K7HA

There is never any accidental mixing of duplexes into upscale subdivisions. The land is too valuable for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2020, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,676,974 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverfall View Post
If they want to put up 400 SF homes they can do so. There is no requirement to subdivide it further. In places like LO and West Linn where there is high demand for single family homes that will remain the property of choice.

Now, if a homeowner, 10 years after buying a single-family home decides they want to spend their money and go through the development process to convert a home to a duplex, they can certainly do that if they want. I don't think people realize how much it costs to develop things and the SDC (System Development Charges) generally turn people away. There are firewall codes, SDC charges, separate metering, etc. It is NOT cheap to convert.
And don't forget HOAs. The state doesn't have the authority to alter private contracts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2020, 10:24 AM
 
Location: WA
5,439 posts, read 7,733,177 times
Reputation: 8554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
And don't forget HOAs. The state doesn't have the authority to alter private contracts.
Yes, actually it does.

Private HOA contracts and deed covenants that perpetrate discrimination (whites only requirements) have been declared illegal and null and void. In some states, certain types of binding arbitration and non-compete clauses in employment have been declared illegal and null and void. HOA restrictions that banned satellite dishes were declared void. Some state are now looking at invaliding HOA restrictions on rooftop solar.

It happens all the time.

Technically the state doesn't alter the private HOA contracts, it just declares them unenforceable. Which amounts to the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2020, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Oregon Coast
15,417 posts, read 9,059,166 times
Reputation: 20391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
The building code requires that any project that big requires the whole structure be upgraded to current codes, starting with foundation, seismic, electrical, plumbing, light and ventilation, egress, etc. etc.

There won't be any cheapie projects. The green starts in your wallet, and you better have a wad.
Do you have a source for that? Because I see additions get built onto houses all the time. Here is the process for Portland. You get a building permit, pay the fee, notify the neighbors, have a construction engineer draw up the plans, get them approved, and you start building. I see nothing about upgrading the whole structure. But even if the whole structure does require upgrades, I don't see how that is going to stop it from happening.


https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/38152

mraa_info_guide_111518
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2020, 02:20 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,822,371 times
Reputation: 10783
I had plans to remodel my current house - I had to change the plans, because some of the remodel touched on an area near the stairs, and the county required the stairs be updated to modern code (they are original to the house and very steep and narrow). Since that would have required massive structural changes to the house, we had to change the plans and resubmit.

So that is one of the devils in detail - the county has to approve the changes and you have to meet the requirements for doing so. It isn't anywhere near as simple as submitting plans (even with a structural engineer's input) and the county just "rubber stamps" them.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
Moderator for: Oregon (and subforums), Auto Racing.
When you signed up for an account, you agreed to abide by the site's TOS and rules. You really should look through them.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
City-Data FAQ: //www.city-data.com/forum/faq/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2020, 07:17 PM
 
9,446 posts, read 6,574,870 times
Reputation: 18898
NOT GOOD. It will just encourage more people to move here and we'll end up again where we are now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top