Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:07 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
so lets see ,so far we blamed landlords , businessman, credit scores , lenders , the gov't , class inequity and THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PLANETS FOR THE LACK OF DRIVE,MOTIVATION AND CREATIVITY FOLKS HAVE FOR EARNING A LIVABLE WAGE all in one thread.
We still need to blame women for working, subsidy kids, & illegal immigrants.

The fat lady hasn't sung yet!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:12 PM
 
106,648 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80127
That hasn't been one of freemkts causes yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:14 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
That hasn't been one of freemkts causes yet.
Wait for it.

Women for working because with 2 incomes rents and housing prices increased.
Subsidy kids because they work min wage jobs.
Illegal immigrants because they drive up rents. (NVM the fact that he lives in Michigan.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:19 PM
 
106,648 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80127
Now you went and gave him more excuses as to why standards and everyone else's incomes should be lowered to accommodate his financial failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:23 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Now you went and gave him more excuses as to why standards and everyone else's incomes should be lowered to accommodate his financial failure.
He has already used those excuses, just not in this thread. That's why I was saying the fat lady hasn't sung yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 10:10 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Wait for it.

Women for working because with 2 incomes rents and housing prices increased.
Subsidy kids because they work min wage jobs.
Illegal immigrants because they drive up rents. (NVM the fact that he lives in Michigan.)

Probably not, because two-income couples tend to be homeowners, not renters, and probably were least subject to foreclosure when the housing bubble burst. Renters free up rental units when they buy houses.

Subsidy kids likely have fast food jobs, hence they're not directly competing with me. And if they're living with parents, that is a very good thing because they're not competing with me for housing.

Illegal immigrants are a big problem for low wage workers, especially those who are paying rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 10:22 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
You hit that right on the head - as your income increases. You are state that a mortgage is what causes the score to improve, but then contradict yourself by saying it's because income increases.

Does having a mortgage now, in your fictional world, equate to income increasing?



As your income increases, assuming you continue to pay as agreed (the premise essentially assumes as much), your available credit will increase...but marginal propensity to spend falls as income increases, so I am presuming that your credit utilization ratio will fall as your income and available credit both increase; hence rising credit score. You may also be able to reallocate your credit to a better (higher-scoring) mix, e.g. pay off credit cards and auto loans, as your income rises.

Having a mortgage does not equate to income increasing, but it does equate to increasing discretionary income because you have locked in your P&I payment and made yourself immune from the rent inflation that keeps renters broke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 10:30 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeo123 View Post
Let's go to the source for this...
Will This Affect My Credit Score? Find Out What's NOT Included.

First off, my income has nothing to do with my score:


Now, let's go to what's included in my score:
FICO Credit Score Chart: How credit scores are calculated

Let's start with the big thing you're hung up on which is the type of credit. You (incorrectly) believe that having a mortgage vs other types of scores will have a material impact on a person's credit score. Well, you're wrong.


Having a mortgage vs a Car Loan will have almost no impact. It's a slight variation in a category that only makes up 10% of your score. At most, you're talking about 1-2 points, and that's assuming the person has no other history. A person with a car loan and a cc is better than a person with 2 cc's, and a mortgage and a cc are better than a car loan and a cc, but the difference between the mortgage and car loan isn't that big.

However:


The amount you owe is a much larger part of your score, and again it's unrelated to income as proven above. What does matter is % utilization/% repayment for a mortgage/installment loan. In that respect, a car loan is better because it's easier to pay off 25% of your car loan than 25% of your mortgage.

Sigh. Marginal propensity to spend fals as income rises - people generally should be able to obtain more credit as their income rises (hence reducing credit utiliization ratio), and pay down their debt, both of which improve credit scores.

OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL, increased income enhances utilization ratio and thus credit score.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 10:38 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Even at my poorest, when I existed on rice and hot dogs, worked 40 hours a week and attended college part time, living in a rented house with 5 other people, I never had a need for a payday loan to make it through "life". If you need a loan to pay for the essentials, like shelter, but make more than the minimum to get govt assistance, you need to seriously re-evaluate the way you are living your life.

I make more than the minimum (maximum?) to get govt assistance, but I live on less than the minimum (maximum?) to get govt assistance because of a student loan garnishment.

In other words, I would qualify for assistance if I earned only the amount on which I actually live, and would probably qualify for more than the amount of the garnishment.

Guess I'm just screwed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 11:46 PM
 
2,294 posts, read 2,779,430 times
Reputation: 3852
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Sigh. Marginal propensity to spend fals as income rises - people generally should be able to obtain more credit as their income rises (hence reducing credit utiliization ratio), and pay down their debt, both of which improve credit scores.

OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL, increased income enhances utilization ratio and thus credit score.
"OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL", increased income has no impact on spending. You can't claim other things being equal, then change other things. If you're changing income and spending, then you're not keeping things equal.

If anything income rising tends to increase "propensity to spend" and that's a well documented fact. While yes, it does taper off eventually, you still have millionaires who are spending more in a day than most people make in a month.

If you're then going to say that despite "OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL" you're going to increase credit limits while keeping balances the same, you're again proving that you're not keeping other things equal.

You can't choose to just keep certain things the same and change others just to suit you need. Either keep everything else the same, or don't.

Quite honestly, I'm not even sure what you're point is anymore. You just seem to be arguing with anyone over anything and going in no real direction.

Last edited by Jeo123; 09-19-2014 at 12:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top