Quote:
Originally Posted by k374
I know someone who in 2009 bought a home for $600,000 and he put $400,000 down on it at the time and took out a mortgage for $200,000. The 400k represented most of his savings and the only other investments he had to his name were his 401k which had around 150k. He was 38 years old at the time. He still thinks that was the best decision as he had a mania of having a house paid off.
In retrospect I see that if he had invested the $400k in the market he would've tripled it by now to $1.2 million. His home is currently valued at $800k so it's gone up a bit but not as much as the market.
If you were in his shoes how would you do this differently?
|
I generally view a house you live in as more of a consumer item than an investment. Sure it has some value, but it has a lot of ongoing costs that homeowners underestimate or forget about.
I don't know where he lives, but if it's not a super expensive metro area, I think 600k is overkill.
That said, he falls in the range of sensible as far as finances go. He made a big down payment on a house. He can likely afford to contribute a lot to a 401k and other outside investments.
Most of good personal finances is just avoiding the dumb things such as taking out too large of a mortgage, which he avoided.
He had an ok, if not fabulous amount in his 401k that he can continue to build on.
So even though it wasn't the best decision, he is still financially sound--and probably more sound than most people in the same income bracket as him.