Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2009, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,550 posts, read 61,629,340 times
Reputation: 30538

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
bek people like you and me listen to dave ramsey and dont spend much time at the mall or in club med. we retire early. we are not victims. we are not rip off artists. but we are not much fun and we are not in the in crowd. people like us "dont make any sense". most people perceive themselves laid back, they are not, they are laying down.
I hear you.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2009, 02:52 PM
 
1,402 posts, read 3,507,399 times
Reputation: 1315
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelsup View Post
Stocks are a house of cards, the only reason they are "worth" something is because others are willing to buy them. They aren't even pieces of paper any more. Real estate has always interested me because it's tangible. Stocks on the other hand can be wiped out to zero.

Stock holders aren't "owners", that is a myth. Perhaps if you own 10% of a company you have a say but this doesn't apply to 99.999999999% of the stock holders out there.
I think you are also underestimating the ability of stock to pay dividends. If those periodic dividends are reinvested to buy more stock in the company, your shares can really build over time. Some experts would say this is the real benefit of owning stock, not so much its increase in value over time.

I can see your point about stock not really being about ownership and you mention in a later post that this ownership is more on paper than a practical ownership....however, this doesn't change the fact that investing in stocks cannot be profitable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2009, 03:45 PM
 
353 posts, read 907,580 times
Reputation: 607
Quote:
Originally Posted by oleo View Post
Because we need money to pay our bills.
Right.

We can barely afford today. We don't have room to worry about paying bills 40 years from now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2009, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,550 posts, read 61,629,340 times
Reputation: 30538
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadbill View Post
I think you are also underestimating the ability of stock to pay dividends. If those periodic dividends are reinvested to buy more stock in the company, your shares can really build over time. Some experts would say this is the real benefit of owning stock, not so much its increase in value over time.

I can see your point about stock not really being about ownership and you mention in a later post that this ownership is more on paper than a practical ownership....however, this doesn't change the fact that investing in stocks cannot be profitable.
Assuming that your stock has not gone belly up entirely, what percentage of those dividends are taxable?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2009, 04:38 PM
 
13,811 posts, read 27,522,143 times
Reputation: 14251
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadbill View Post
I think you are also underestimating the ability of stock to pay dividends.
Nope definitely not.

DVY - iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend (ETF) - Google Finance

Down 50% just to make 3.5%-5% dividend. Sounds like a killer deal to me!!! A house of cards my friend, a house of cards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2009, 05:12 PM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,443,483 times
Reputation: 10696
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelsup View Post
Nope definitely not.

DVY - iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend (ETF) - Google Finance

Down 50% just to make 3.5%-5% dividend. Sounds like a killer deal to me!!! A house of cards my friend, a house of cards.
Stocks are a LONG term investment my friend. You can't look at the short term ups and downs of the stock market. Look at a company like 3M, their stock is down oh, 50% or so over the past couple years but it is still UP $20/share from 20 years ago--yes at ONE TIME it was worth more but if you bought 1000 shares 20 years ago and sold today during some of the worst market conditions ever you would still have made $20,000 on your shares--how is that a bad thing?

Heck, if you had invested $10,000 in 1934 in a blue chip type stock that $10,000 would have been worth $70 MILLION at the end of 2007 (obviously less now but even at 3 million that is a heck of a gain).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2009, 06:00 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,824,124 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgal View Post

Heck, if you had invested $10,000 in 1934 in a blue chip type stock that $10,000 would have been worth $70 MILLION at the end of 2007 (obviously less now but even at 3 million that is a heck of a gain).
Coincidence you should mention 1934....

I know a man that bought a home for $2500 in 1934 and sold it in 2007 for 650k... so that would be 2.6million on 10k and he lived and raised his family there.

A 10,000 dollar Duesenberg would go for at least 5 million today... even after the crash...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2009, 09:31 PM
 
13,811 posts, read 27,522,143 times
Reputation: 14251
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgal View Post
Stocks are a LONG term investment my friend. You can't look at the short term ups and downs of the stock market. Look at a company like 3M, their stock is down oh, 50% or so over the past couple years but it is still UP $20/share from 20 years ago--yes at ONE TIME it was worth more but if you bought 1000 shares 20 years ago and sold today during some of the worst market conditions ever you would still have made $20,000 on your shares--how is that a bad thing?

Heck, if you had invested $10,000 in 1934 in a blue chip type stock that $10,000 would have been worth $70 MILLION at the end of 2007 (obviously less now but even at 3 million that is a heck of a gain).
You're missing my point. Has the value of 3M as a company actually fallen 50%? Are they truly worth half as much as they were 1 year ago? I doubt it. Yet their stock says otherwise. Why? Because people get scared and sell. The only reason a stock is worth $X is because someone is willing to pay that much for it. If no one wants it, it's value is $0.

I invest in stocks because that's what my 401k allows me to do. But there isn't any real value in them. They aren't even paper any more. Japan's stock market hit a high of almost 40,000 points 15 (?) years ago. Now it's down to 8000 or so I believe. Long term horizon? I hope so! Not only did stocks do nothing for 15 years they have lost 75% of their value. Their decline started exactly how ours did - cheap money with a run up in real estate and commodity prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2009, 04:56 PM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,443,483 times
Reputation: 10696
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelsup View Post
You're missing my point. Has the value of 3M as a company actually fallen 50%? Are they truly worth half as much as they were 1 year ago? I doubt it. Yet their stock says otherwise. Why? Because people get scared and sell. The only reason a stock is worth $X is because someone is willing to pay that much for it. If no one wants it, it's value is $0.

I invest in stocks because that's what my 401k allows me to do. But there isn't any real value in them. They aren't even paper any more. Japan's stock market hit a high of almost 40,000 points 15 (?) years ago. Now it's down to 8000 or so I believe. Long term horizon? I hope so! Not only did stocks do nothing for 15 years they have lost 75% of their value. Their decline started exactly how ours did - cheap money with a run up in real estate and commodity prices.
I do see your point and yes, if no one was willing to by 3M stock it is worth nothing but that isn't happening. Trades are still happening and if you owned 3M stock and wanted to sell it today you WOULD find a buyer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 10:28 PM
 
Location: Bay View, Milwaukee
2,567 posts, read 5,332,038 times
Reputation: 3674
I'm close to maximizing my 403b contributions, and I may in fact make the maximum this year, but I've been setting aside money for a sizeable emergency fund. The $2500 (or so) difference in my contributions have made a difference over the past few years in helping me build that fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top