Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2017, 08:38 PM
 
2,809 posts, read 3,195,050 times
Reputation: 2709

Advertisements

Ouch. I had no idea it was this bad. who made those stupid pension deals, particularly with fire and police? - Now they are an anchor on our budget for the next 10 years. You want to be mayor/city manager? -Then your job is to take any revenue you can get in the next ten years and then shove it to the public pension fund. There is not a lot left for anything else.

From the AZ Central article:

Soaring pension costs still crippling Phoenix budget
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2017, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Rural Michigan
6,341 posts, read 14,742,759 times
Reputation: 10551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potential_Landlord View Post
Ouch. I had no idea it was this bad. who made those stupid pension deals, particularly with fire and police? - Now they are an anchor on our budget for the next 10 years. You want to be mayor/city manager? -Then your job is to take any revenue you can get in the next ten years and then shove it to the public pension fund. There is not a lot left for anything else.

From the AZ Central article:

Soaring pension costs still crippling Phoenix budget
Both the city and the state pay well under market-rate for new employee labor, (and often way too much for "experienced" employees).. the trade-off is the pensions and the benefits. Take away the pensions & the benefits & they won't be able to hire or retain anyone. There's no quick fix for this that doesn't have long-term implications. As it is, the "average" new state employee is 20% underpaid, according to the state's hr department - with no plan at all in place to correct that, as the economy improves the best & brightest will leave & departments will be staffed with those that the private sector doesn't want. Classic "penny wise, pound foolish" behavior.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,211 posts, read 2,255,494 times
Reputation: 2607
The problem is universal across virtually all governmental organizations with pensions....they are only sustainable if the revenues keep climbing which fortunately Phoenix is still having. I don't think the pensions look out of line with most other cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,130 posts, read 51,428,209 times
Reputation: 28387
First off, it's the public safety pensions, not all of them that are the main problem. Cops and fire fighters don't work enough years to cover the decades they spend in retirement. ALso, they get sweet deals where they contribute little or nothing out of their own paychecks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 07:52 AM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,395,367 times
Reputation: 14004
This is nothing new and has been happening for a long time and effecting cities and towns, big and small, all across this country from the 5th largest city of Phoenix with 1.5 million people to my hometown of Scranton, PA with 75,000 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,696,528 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
First off, it's the public safety pensions, not all of them that are the main problem. Cops and fire fighters don't work enough years to cover the decades they spend in retirement. ALso, they get sweet deals where they contribute little or nothing out of their own paychecks.
But they take MUCH greater physical risk than pretty much any other profession. Without some type of sweet reward, no one would do it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 09:33 AM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,395,367 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
But they take MUCH greater physical risk than pretty much any other profession. Without some type of sweet reward, no one would do it
That's why, if you want to go into these types of professions, the key is to find a nice medium-sized city with a low COL and a relatively low crime rate and few fires, then you're set!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 10:02 AM
 
2,809 posts, read 3,195,050 times
Reputation: 2709
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
But they take MUCH greater physical risk than pretty much any other profession. Without some type of sweet reward, no one would do it
There's 9 private sector jobs with higher fatality rate before police and fire isn't even in there at all. Where's the pension crisis for fishers and lumberjacks? If anyone then they deserve it.



fishers and related fishing workers: 116.0
logging workers: 91.9
aircraft pilots and flight engineers: 70.6
farmers and ranchers: 41.4
mining machine operators: 38.7
roofers: 32.4
refuse and recyclable material collectors: 29.8
driver/sales workers and truck drivers: 21.8
industrial machinery installation, repair and maintenance workers: 20.3, and
police and sheriff’s patrol officers: 18.0.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 10:11 AM
 
2,809 posts, read 3,195,050 times
Reputation: 2709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zippyman View Post
Both the city and the state pay well under market-rate for new employee labor, (and often way too much for "experienced" employees).. the trade-off is the pensions and the benefits. Take away the pensions & the benefits & they won't be able to hire or retain anyone. There's no quick fix for this that doesn't have long-term implications. As it is, the "average" new state employee is 20% underpaid, according to the state's hr department - with no plan at all in place to correct that, as the economy improves the best & brightest will leave & departments will be staffed with those that the private sector doesn't want. Classic "penny wise, pound foolish" behavior.
I think the issue is mostly public safety workers. State & city employee pension costs go up too but minimal compared to police & fire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 10:31 AM
 
296 posts, read 366,109 times
Reputation: 494
The pensions I saw didn't seem out of line at all. The highest pensions are going to those who worked approx. 30+ years for the city of Phoenix. I especially see the pensions for Fire Fighters and Police being appropriate. These are the people who risk and sometimes loose their lives for the people of Phoenix.

Quote:
Originally Posted by From Article
The average pension for a retired Phoenix employee is about $32,200 per year for civilians and $63,900 for public-safety workers.

As someone else mentioned, often government employees trade lower salaries for better benefits. In the case of Firefighters and Police, they should be well compensated including retirement for the work and risk they do for the city. I can't imagine that this debate is good for present morale either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by From Article
"Pensions are definitely a problem, but to lay this at the feet of police and fire is a ruse," DiCiccio wrote in a statement. "It is the fault of the managers and the politicians who allowed this to happen by refusing to prioritize city functions and stop reckless spending."
Retirement payout is predictable. It is evident that the Phoenix retirement plan has been underfunded for a long time to cause this "crisis". The answer here is not slashing the budgets for needed services and functions. Unfortunately part of the answer is likely raised taxes. If that had been done years ago with proper financial planning the impact would have been minimal. Now it is likely to hurt more. Noone likes to be the ones who raise taxes, but money doesn't grow on palm trees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top