Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2012, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983

Advertisements

Are the Stillers expected to pick up any of the cost for this?

ETA: I guess they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2012, 01:40 PM
 
Location: S.W.PA
1,360 posts, read 2,951,661 times
Reputation: 1047
The walkway connection is for the purpose of getting Steeler fans off of the street in order to limit liability associated with the potential interraction with traffic.
The connection(s) is not a simple thing, if you think about people queing on an elevated walkway and the need to a) check tickets and b) exit those people in the event of an emergency.
This will be a significant revision, hence the price tag.
What is certain is that the aesthetic of the current station will be completely altered when all is said and done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Mexican War Streets
1,584 posts, read 2,095,574 times
Reputation: 1389
What we paid for the North Shore Connector

Interesting math.

Money quote:

"So if you are the typical county taxpayer who also paid federal and state personal income taxes, your share was about $45, spread over nearly six years. Since rides are free on the connector, if you use it 20 times, you break even on the deal."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 11:47 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,022,351 times
Reputation: 2911
Also interesting that the parking garage is now filling up daily.

Generally, as much as this project has been criticized as a boondoggle, from a local perspective the benefits WAY exceed the costs. The thing that will always frustrate me is that it could have been even more useful with a different routing, but nonetheless we're definitely much better off having it instead of nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,823,631 times
Reputation: 2973
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Also interesting that the parking garage is now filling up daily.

Generally, as much as this project has been criticized as a boondoggle, from a local perspective the benefits WAY exceed the costs. The thing that will always frustrate me is that it could have been even more useful with a different routing, but nonetheless we're definitely much better off having it instead of nothing.
even if the pnc park station had been built in the original location it would work for a potential future routing via allegheny ctr (and going backwards, had gateway been built differently it would not have had to be rebuilt, thus lowering the cost of this project). still, if the theory is working, I believe one stop could be added at north ave east of the highway serving a neighborhood before it's eventual extension (I presume it was meant to eventually connect to the west busway?)...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Mexican War Streets
1,584 posts, read 2,095,574 times
Reputation: 1389
Quote:
The big news for Pittsburgh was a 13.5 percent increase in ridership on the Light Rail Transit system, fueled by the debut of the North Shore Connector, evidently now officially minted as a Tunnel to Somewhere. Riders took nearly 700,000 more rail rides than in the first nine months of 2011.
Apparently, we LOVE our North Shore Connector
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2012, 07:25 PM
 
6,601 posts, read 8,984,298 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lobick View Post
I don't think this tells the full story, but nonetheless I am happy to see positive news about it. It provides support for future expansion of PAT service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 08:44 AM
 
5,802 posts, read 9,897,487 times
Reputation: 3051
PAT, the City, and County...Have a real opportunity to have real Transit Oriented Development around the NSC, particularly Allegheny station, if they do this right. People wont mind making the transfer as long as its fast free and convenient into downtown (and Oakland), would get a lot of bus congestion out of Downtown as well.

Again done RIGHT, it could be very successful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 10:36 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,022,351 times
Reputation: 2911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbeauty212 View Post
PAT, the City, and County...Have a real opportunity to have real Transit Oriented Development around the NSC, particularly Allegheny station, if they do this right. People wont mind making the transfer as long as its fast free and convenient into downtown (and Oakland), would get a lot of bus congestion out of Downtown as well.
I don't like the idea of using transfers to the NSC for a lot of Downtown-bound bus traffic. Transfers are ridership killers to begin with, and the NSC is also pretty slow.

I do like the idea of TOD around the NSC stations, however. There are a lot of surface parking lots available for such projects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,823,631 times
Reputation: 2973
interesting that ridership increased at a faster rate than the average both on light rail (top five) and bus
Quote:
...(PAT)Bus ridership was up 3.4 percent for the period
Quote:
Light-rail ridership climbed 4.2 percent in the nine-month period, with 22 out of 28 light-rail systems reporting growth. Light-rail systems reporting double-digit gains were located in Memphis (33.7 percent), Salt Lake City (19.7 percent), Los Angeles (13.7 percent), Pittsburgh (13.5 percent) and Seattle (11.2 percent)....
Rail News - APTA: Transit ridership rose 2.6 percent in 2012's first nine months. For Railroad Career Professionals
Quote:
Nationally, bus ridership rose by 1.8 percent from January through September of 2012,
More Than 7.9 Billion Trips Taken On Public Transportation As Ridership Increased by 2.6% in First Three Quarters of 2012
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top