Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2010, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh area
9,912 posts, read 24,660,570 times
Reputation: 5164

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
I'd say this isn't really a "little thing" though -- logically speaking, you'd think the insurance company would be glad to replace damaged gutters because it will be cheaper to do that than to eventually eat a claim for damages to the house or foundation that would result if the gutters aren't fixed.
Agreed. I was referencing a prior post about those who file numerous small claims. The only thing in question with the gutters is how significant is the damage and what is the cost. If the cost is not much more than the deductible amount, and I could afford that outlay, I would not submit a claim. Heck, for me, I'm on the hook for the first grand anyway, so it's going to take something fairly significant to get to where I'm filing a claim. But even at $500 deductible, if it's $800 or something for repair, I'm not sure I'd be filing it. At $1000 or so for repair, then it's a more sure thing.

Basically it's weighing what the effect on my premiums would be from filing the claim. It's a little easier with the car insurance, actually. I don't know as much how to judge it with homeowners. But it feels like a couple hundred or so above the deductible amount I would probably just eat figuring that I could quickly be paying more than that in increased premiums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2010, 07:29 PM
 
3 posts, read 10,811 times
Reputation: 11
Because this weather event was labeled a catastrophe by insurance companies, they will not raise rates because so many people were affected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2010, 07:31 AM
 
43,011 posts, read 108,071,598 times
Reputation: 30721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
At the risk of pointing out the obvious... why not just ask your insurance agent? (S)he'll be able to give you a more definitive answer than we could.
I am interested in other people's experiences. Like you, I clearly like to discuss topics on City-Data for the mere enjoyment. Plus, I don't even know my insurance agent. This policy is 30 years old. When we remortgaged the house 15 years ago, the insurance payments are made directly from the bank. I know it would be easy enough to find my agent since I know our insurance provider, but I'm not even sure if I want to go this route and I wanted to toss the idea around on here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by robrobrob View Post
I got water in my house like many others due to ice backing up in the gutters. Anyway, I have an adjuster coming out in a couple of weeks. My concern is about the water within the walls and not visible damage. On the surface, it seems as if the damage is relatively minor but who knows what happened inside the walls. My adjuster says he doesn't care about a moisture reading. I thought that would be pretty important. Anyway, my walls for the most part look okay but there was water pouring through them last week. Thoughts?
That's a tough one! Of course the adjuster is only interested in visible damage since his job is to save the insurance company money. It's up to you to find the damage. Since it has been so recent, it's not likely that you already have mold growing, but maybe you do. If you find you have more damage and mold growing at a later date, I would think that the insurance company would have to pay for it since it was caused by this incident. I'd call the insurance agent to find out if there are any time constraints. If so, I'd hire someone to investigate if there is more extensive damage than the adjuster is covering to prove to the insurance company that more damage exists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
I'd say this isn't really a "little thing" though -- logically speaking, you'd think the insurance company would be glad to replace damaged gutters because it will be cheaper to do that than to eventually eat a claim for damages to the house or foundation that would result if the gutters aren't fixed.
They would likely say the damage to the house or foundation were the result of lack of maintenance. Just because they don't pay to replace the gutters doesn't mean that they don't expect the homeowner to replace them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greg42 View Post
But it feels like a couple hundred or so above the deductible amount I would probably just eat figuring that I could quickly be paying more than that in increased premiums.
I always felt this way. Even a thousand dollars over the deductible is within my range of not filing a claim. I'm starting to rethink this though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCgum View Post
Because this weather event was labeled a catastrophe by insurance companies, they will not raise rates because so many people were affected.
I would sure hope so! I suspect they will raise rates across the board though. As a result, it wouldn't matter if we claimed it because everyone's rates will be raised anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top