Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you agree or disagree with the BP being forced to put $ 20 billion in escrow
Agree ( Democrat) 32 25.40%
Disagree (Democrat) 0 0%
Agree (Republican) 8 6.35%
Disagree (Republican) 16 12.70%
Agree (Independent/ Other) 55 43.65%
Disagree (Independent/ Other) 15 11.90%
Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2010, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,191 posts, read 19,473,387 times
Reputation: 5305

Advertisements

I know we have several threads on the subject already, but I think we should have a poll on the subject.

In wake of the comments by Republican reps Bachmann and Barton in which they criticized the Obama administration for basically forcing BP to set up a $20 billion escrow account for the damages of the oil spill (comments in which they, especially Barton were criticized for by members of his own party),

Do you agree or disagree with the Obama administration basically forcing BP to set up the $ 20 billion escrow account.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2010, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
Agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,830,565 times
Reputation: 12341
You mess it up, you pay for the fix. Especially considering the immediate impact on the people and natural resources. Can't take responsibility... quit doing business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
3,390 posts, read 4,952,271 times
Reputation: 2049
You should have included an "I have no idea." Honestly, I don't know because I have only read bits and pieces here and there. Culpability and whatnot, so I'm not qualified to answer. They are DEFINITELY liable though.

It also depends on where that 20B is going. I'm sure Nancy Pelosi and her husband will have a hand in that cash cow somehow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,367,910 times
Reputation: 2922
From what I have gathered the POTUS met with BP and they agreed to the 20 billion fund and a 3rd party to dole out the claims.Where is proof of force,please post a link.If they agreed willingly I have no problem.They have said all along that they would take responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,753,051 times
Reputation: 9330
Post a link that says they agreed willingly.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 05:42 PM
 
Location: lake zurich, il
3,197 posts, read 2,853,909 times
Reputation: 1217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Post a link that says they agreed willingly.....
I could not give half a **** if they agreed willingly. Its their oil they MUST take responsibility for that no matter how expensive it will be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 05:48 PM
 
Location: NC
1,251 posts, read 2,578,250 times
Reputation: 588
The whole thing sucks BP will end up in court for years and probably pull stakes taking those jobs to brazil. They should pay for the whole whole frigging thing but not by black mail. They accepted blame already and have been cooperitive they could have said F off
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 05:49 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,168,101 times
Reputation: 6195
Insultingly low number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 05:50 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24994
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Insultingly low number.
What number should it be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:59 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top