Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2010, 11:23 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,373,465 times
Reputation: 3656

Advertisements

What can be learned from this?

America's most recession-proof cities - Jun. 24, 2010
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2010, 11:27 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,332,939 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
How come Texas doesn't return oil profit taxes to their citizens like Alaska does?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2010, 11:30 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,619,498 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
Rochester and Buffalo being on there vindicates what I've been saying - this recession represents the beginning of the end for the Sun Belt, and the beginning of the resurrection of the Eastern Rust Belt (i.e. east of Cleveland).
Why? Because water is plentiful in the Great Lakes region, and very scarce in the Sunbelt.

Albany is sort of Rust Belt-ish, which further vindicates what I've been saying. Pittsburgh's been doing OK, too. On the other hand, Southern CA, AZ, and NV basically have no future, unfortunately, because of water issues that threaten to dwarf every other issue they have to deal with. Sad, but true. And climate change is only going to accentuate this.

Texas isn't really part of the Sunbelt because they don't have problems with water like the Southwestern states do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2010, 11:50 PM
 
1,080 posts, read 2,270,647 times
Reputation: 599
^Other than the fact about climate change (which is a piece of crap) I agree with your entire post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2010, 11:58 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,902,805 times
Reputation: 18305
Having been on the end of the 70's recession blow dealt to my region its going to take decades for many regions hit hard at their economic base to recover or more accurately change. What has slowly been happening for decades is just accellerated by this recession.Water is not likely to play any aprt for deacvdes to come and if the ice melts are true then you can kiss water areas goodbye.The dessert might just bloom in time but we wouldn't be here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2010, 12:01 AM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,451,823 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Rochester and Buffalo being on there vindicates what I've been saying - this recession represents the beginning of the end for the Sun Belt, and the beginning of the resurrection of the Eastern Rust Belt (i.e. east of Cleveland).
Why? Because water is plentiful in the Great Lakes region, and very scarce in the Sunbelt.

Albany is sort of Rust Belt-ish, which further vindicates what I've been saying. Pittsburgh's been doing OK, too. On the other hand, Southern CA, AZ, and NV basically have no future, unfortunately, because of water issues that threaten to dwarf every other issue they have to deal with. Sad, but true. And climate change is only going to accentuate this.

Texas isn't really part of the Sunbelt because they don't have problems with water like the Southwestern states do.
Having grown up in Albany, and having gone to college in Rochester, here is my assessment tho: They never had the boom, so they didn't have the bust.

Last edited by juppiter; 06-25-2010 at 12:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2010, 12:09 AM
 
2,023 posts, read 5,315,316 times
Reputation: 2004
The most recession proof is in Nebraska, South Dakota and North Dakota. These areas don't have to deal with those terrible auto inspections like Texas does which is great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2010, 04:28 AM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,476,991 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
Having grown up in Albany, and having gone to college in Rochester, here is my assessment tho: They never had the boom, so they didn't have the bust.
Kind of hard to argue with that logic. Those cities haven't been doing well anyway. When your at the bottom your not dropping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2010, 04:50 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,764,037 times
Reputation: 9728
There seem to be a number of state capitals on that list. Government jobs are pretty secure. State capitals are often service-based (health care etc.) or white-collar, which is also a bit more secure than manufacturing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2010, 05:03 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,764,037 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Rochester and Buffalo being on there vindicates what I've been saying - this recession represents the beginning of the end for the Sun Belt, and the beginning of the resurrection of the Eastern Rust Belt (i.e. east of Cleveland).
Why? Because water is plentiful in the Great Lakes region, and very scarce in the Sunbelt.

Albany is sort of Rust Belt-ish, which further vindicates what I've been saying. Pittsburgh's been doing OK, too. On the other hand, Southern CA, AZ, and NV basically have no future, unfortunately, because of water issues that threaten to dwarf every other issue they have to deal with. Sad, but true. And climate change is only going to accentuate this.

Texas isn't really part of the Sunbelt because they don't have problems with water like the Southwestern states do.
Though the tendency of what you say might be there, you are exaggerating Southern California having no future?! Growth will be modest, which is a good thing as there are indeed big environmental problems, but I wouldn't say it has no future
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top