Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:29 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,858,535 times
Reputation: 9283

Advertisements

I suspect that the Republicans wanted to piggyback the bill with something since it was an "easy" yes apparently... don't matter, its going to go back up later under normal rules to be voted... so Wiener (or whatever the name) seems to be more grandstanding than anything... Democrats in the past have done the same thing, refuse to pass legislation so that they can piggyback things... Republicans do it and the liberals here act like its never been done before... Is it wrong? Yeah.. but I don't see the Democrats stopping anytime soon...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:33 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,129,736 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
The Dems did not need a single vote from the Reps to get this through the house. Explain to me why the Dems did not pass it.
//www.city-data.com/forum/15267888-post40.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Yeah, with 90% of Democrats being for and 90% of Republicans against, it only makes sense to criticize the Democrats.
But Weiner screamed at King that he had delivered 94% of Dems and you say 90%. One of you is wrong and Weiner was screaming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpNort View Post
How about just the bill for 9/11 and not stick other junk in it that has nothing to do with 9/11.
That is tough to do when you are trying to get some political garbage for the election.

King said that when the bill is voted on, later, without all the restrictions they allowed yesterday it will pass easily. What kind of foolish rule would force a vote of 2/3 in the House where only a majority is needed, as we saw with the Health Care (Reform) bill. Games are being played by the Dems of Pelosi and it is so easy to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:41 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
That is tough to do when you are trying to get some political garbage for the election.

King said that when the bill is voted on, later, without all the restrictions they allowed yesterday it will pass easily. What kind of foolish rule would force a vote of 2/3 in the House where only a majority is needed, as we saw with the Health Care (Reform) bill. Games are being played by the Dems of Pelosi and it is so easy to see.
So it would be an actual 9/11 bill and not have a bunch of amendments attached to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbird82 View Post
Eh...don't know what this issue is really about but he did bring up a good point in his rant and Ii'm glad he called out the other members of congress. It's true, you either support the bill or you don't...don't try to mask your decision in a facade of legal jargon.
All the Weeny was doing was trying to get some garbage to throw on Republicans at election time. I would have told him that I voted against the bill because I couldn't support it as it was written so he had to admit that it was loaded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
All the Weeny was doing was trying to get some garbage to throw on Republicans at election time. I would have told him that I voted against the bill because I couldn't support it as it was written so he had to admit that it was loaded.
What about the bill could you not support as written?? The fact the GOp wasn't able to throw in a bunch of un related Amendments uinto the bill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
The Dems did not need a single vote from the Reps to get this through the house. Explain to me why the Dems did not pass it.
They put in that silly 2/3 vote thing knowing that Republicans would likely vote against it. It is all politics and nothing else. It is too bad that latere they will pass it with ease with normal rules. Nasty Nancy knows what she is doing and Weeny Weiner was working with her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
They put in that silly 2/3 vote thing knowing that Republicans would likely vote against it. It is all politics and nothing else. It is too bad that latere they will pass it with ease with normal rules. Nasty Nancy knows what she is doing and Weeny Weiner was working with her.

They put the 2/3 in so the bill wouldn't be bogged down with Amendments. They wanted strictly a vote on this legislation as is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
What about the bill could you not support as written?? The fact the GOp wasn't able to throw in a bunch of un related Amendments uinto the bill?
You know what happened and you also know that the Weeny was playing a game like he so often does when playing the political game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top