Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Now that the nasty old bat Helen Thomas is gone, there was a bit of competition for the front row seat. AP gets Helen's old seat, Fox moves up.
By this decision, the board shows how much they respect Fox as a news organization, even of the face of petitions from the Left to award the seat to anybody but Fox.
But you like to call the WH the fringe left. Make up your mind.
So the RW line on Helen Thomas is that she was a "nasty old bat"? She wasn't exactly good looking but do you have any idea the valuable role she played on behalf of the free press, that is, you?
You really need to pick. Either you think Fox is biased or it's not. You can't have it both ways.
Well, you can ... but then everything you say from here on out should be taken with a grain of salt.
Their commentators seem to be biased, at least to me and a great deal of rational thinking people.
I'm sure they have many fine employees who aren't biased, nor want to be. However, many of their "on air personalities" seem to have a conservative bias.
While this is a clearly biased link I'm about to post, it contains a great deal of links to actual news broadcasts, and transcripts.
FOX News Bias Evidence (http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/foxbias.htm - broken link)
Their commentators seem to be biased, at least to me and a great deal of rational thinking people.
I'm sure they have many fine employees who aren't biased, nor want to be. However, many of their "on air personalities" seem to have a conservative bias.
While this is a clearly biased link I'm about to post, it contains a great deal of links to actual news broadcasts, and transcripts.
FOX News Bias Evidence (http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/foxbias.htm - broken link)
I went through about 1/2 of the links and nothing seems to be more current than 2006. Most were from 2001-2004 at best.
Yeah, they aren't biased anymore, but they used to be, so thats ok.
A tiger can't change his stripes.....
You seem to be very big on "show me proof" & "link please" so I thought the severely outdated links were worth mentioning.
Just trying to keep everything fair & balanced.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
