Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Prop. 8: Judge Walker's bias will be overruled
"Judge Walker's ruling proves, however, that the American people were and are right to fear that too many powerful judges do not respect their views, or the proper limits of judicial authority.
Judge Walker has added insult to injury by suggesting that support for marriage is somehow irrational bigotry, akin to racial animus. The majority of Americans are not bigots or haters for supporting the commonsense view that marriage is the union of husband and wife, because children need moms and dads.
Judge Walker's view is truly a radical rejection of Americans' rights, our history and our institutions that will only fuel a popular rebellion now taking place against elites who are more interested in remaking American institutions than respecting them."
There's not a single word of truth in that entire piece of garbage.
I wonder if a liberal can even admit that a gay couple cannot procreate. That two people of the same sex cannot produce a child,an dif they use some kind of scientific intervention, the child will still only biologically be related to one of the couple, not both.
I wonder when people will understand that biologically, it doesn't matter whether or not the kid belongs to both parents in the scenario in question.
Or that gay couples have proven to be just as good as hetero couples in terms of parenting.
Therefore, the "parenting" and children argument doesn't work against gay marriage anymore.
It only strengthens the case for homosexual marriage.
I wonder if a liberal can even admit that a gay couple cannot procreate. That two people of the same sex cannot produce a child,an dif they use some kind of scientific intervention, the child will still only biologically be related to one of the couple, not both.
Um, yeah your correct - so what? The same applies to a family of a mother with a child who is married to someone other than the father.
I wonder if a liberal can even admit that a gay couple cannot procreate. That two people of the same sex cannot produce a child,an dif they use some kind of scientific intervention, the child will still only biologically be related to one of the couple, not both.
Who gives a damn? And what relevance could that possibly have? Millions of heterosexual couples cannot procreate, my husband and I among them. And guess what, when we adopt our foster child, he or she won't be biologically related to either of us! How that relates to whether or not we should be allowed to marry is utterly beyond my comprehension and completely absurd!
I wonder when people will understand that biologically, it doesn't matter whether or not the kid belongs to both parents in the question scenario.
Or that gay couples have proven to be just as good as hetero couples in terms of parenting.
Therefore, the "parenting" and children argument doesn't work against gay marriage anymore.
It only strengthens the case for homosexual marriage.
I'm not saying that it matters. My point is, is that a liberal cannot even admit something that is factually true. I don't think it should be a consideration for people to get married, but can you ADMIT that homosexuals cannot produce offspring?
I'm not saying that it matters. My point is, is that a liberal cannot even admit something that is factually true. I don't think it should be a consideration for people to get married, but can you ADMIT that homosexuals cannot produce offspring?
Biologically, no. Homosexuals cannot produce offspring. I know of no liberals that will deny this fact. However, that fact is completely irrelevant, and asinine to even bring up.
No... his sexuality is not a reason to remove himself anymore than a heterosexual should since by this reasoning they could be biased against the plaintiff.
Yes it very much is on this case it is. Hence this thread.
Who gives a damn? And what relevance could that possibly have? Millions of heterosexual couples cannot procreate, my husband and I among them. And guess what, when we adopt our foster child, he or she won't be biologically related to either of us! How that relates to whether or not we should be allowed to marry is utterly beyond my comprehension and completely absurd!
But can you state something that is factually correct that is not politically correct, that homosexuals cannot produce offspring?
I'm not saying that it matters. My point is, is that a liberal cannot even admit something that is factually true. I don't think it should be a consideration for people to get married, but can you ADMIT that homosexuals cannot produce offspring?
If it doesn't matter, then why would you ask people to admit to something. That's like discussing whether we should send a manned mission to Mars, and in the middle of the discussion demanding that someone admit that the moon's orbit is degrading. Do you have a point, or not?
I wonder if a liberal can even admit that a gay couple cannot procreate. That two people of the same sex cannot produce a child,an dif they use some kind of scientific intervention, the child will still only biologically be related to one of the couple, not both.
It's all part of the Gay Agenda, to brainwash people into thinking that the gay lifestyle is somehow normal and not an aberration.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
