Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hopefully more and more Christians will step up to protest the homosexual agenda. Everyone needs to keep their sex life and their perversions behind closed doors.
Hopefully more and more Christians will step up to protest the things that are actually threatening our Democracy instead of issues that are none of their holier than thou business.
I disagree with all of them, but I didn't vote. My philosophy stands with Jesus. Don't focus on the issue. Focus on the people. That's what Jesus did (i.e., The Woman Caught in Adultery). Laws don't stop people from doing what they want to do. I sense that a lot of Christians, even myself at times, put too much hope in this world when it is quite clear that our (Christians) hope is in Jesus.
Thousands rally against gay marriage, abortion (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/09/04/state/n160215D00.DTL&tsp=1 - broken link)
The organizer of this rally is a top Republican religious leader who supports Uganda's proposed "death to homosexuals" law.
What a horrible bunch of people that rally must have been.
Did you notice these words at the end of the article? Last month Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker struck down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional. The measure approved by 52 percent of California voters in November 2008 amended the state Constitution to outlaw same-sex unions five months after the state Supreme Court legalized them.
It seems to me that those words point out that California's constitution had already been amended by the state Supreme Court before the voters voted to amend that section. Are you one of those who thinks that judge made law can be used to amend constitutions?
What a horrible bunch of people that rally must have been.
Did you notice these words at the end of the article? Last month Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker struck down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional. The measure approved by 52 percent of California voters in November 2008 amended the state Constitution to outlaw same-sex unions five months after the state Supreme Court legalized them.
It seems to me that those words point out that California's constitution had already been amended by the state Supreme Court before the voters voted to amend that section. Are you one of those who thinks that judge made law can be used to amend constitutions?
Except, if you'd bothered reading the ruling, you'd know that Judge Walker ruled it unconstitutional according to the US Constitution, not the California Constitution. This was a FEDERAL court, not a state court. Since you're former teacher, I'm surprised you didn't do a better job of doing your homework.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All I did was post what the news story said, just like we do every minute of the day on this forum.
