Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
It was said pretty early in the article that within two weeks there was what the FBI man considered a rock solid case. I guess that makes either Bush or Clinton guilty since Bush wasn't finally elected till late December and the general part of the election was held about a week after the "rock solid" thing was known.
Bush was surely supposed to deal with everything he inherited just like Obama was but for some reason both Clinton and Bush were held back by the lack of police (FBI) and spy agencies (CIA) according to the Gorelick Wall. Very little ability of the nation to deal with too many things because of that wall.
|
Roy, roy, roy....
Just to play along with this characteristically weak line of argument.
Clinton had
3 months to deal with the Cole bombing and Bush had
8 months
AFTER the inauguration
IF you accept that no one in the Bush campaign knew anything about the Cole bombing prior to the inauguration, which I seriously doubt.
Either way the article is BS, because planning for 9/11 began in 1999!
http://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/staff_statement_16.pdf (broken link)
You make this oh so easy.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
