Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-15-2010, 03:41 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,060,453 times
Reputation: 545

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oh is the war over....?????


funny that's not what obama has said...he is increasing the troops in afganastan and increasing the war spending...........

let's me guess...its different now.....



btw...the stimulus spending is over...and obamas fy11 budget is 1.2 trillion in the hole.....
A $1 TRILLION hole created by George Bush...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2010, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Massapequa Park
3,172 posts, read 6,766,807 times
Reputation: 1374
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Clinton raised the top marginal tax rate from 31 percent to 39.6 percent. Contrary to the apocalyptic predictions forwarded from the Austrian school, the U.S. economy sustained the longest period of growth in U.S. history from 1992 to 2000. Clinton produced a historical high of 21 million new jobs.

Interest-rates fell by 40 percent, facilitating the greatest housing boom in history; inflation fell to 2.5 percent, halving the average of the previous 12 years; and the largest budget surplus in history, $128 billion, was created despite Reagan’s mammoth deficits.

Just F*** it and do it. Why should future generations have to pay for everyone else's gluttony...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 06:55 AM
 
30,299 posts, read 18,854,364 times
Reputation: 21206
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
A $1 TRILLION hole created by George Bush...
1. Obama has presided over deficit spending of $1.4 and $1.5 trillion. Next year is projected to be $1.3 trillion.

2. Obama has presided over the largest deficit spending in US history

3. The economy under Bush was fine until the democratic congress gained control.

4. Congress controls spending. They can "defund" any project or agenda of the POTUS.

5. The collective deficits of Obama over the four years of his presidency will dwarf that of Bush during his eight years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Massapequa Park
3,172 posts, read 6,766,807 times
Reputation: 1374
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
1. Obama has presided over deficit spending of $1.4 and $1.5 trillion. Next year is projected to be $1.3 trillion.

2. Obama has presided over the largest deficit spending in US history

3. The economy under Bush was fine until the democratic congress gained control.

4. Congress controls spending. They can "defund" any project or agenda of the POTUS.

5. The collective deficits of Obama over the four years of his presidency will dwarf that of Bush during his eight years.
Bush & Blackwater got us into these expensive as$ wars. They looted us for 7 years and still looting us as we speak and you're talking about OB overspending??? The war has cost over $1+ Trillion to date with nothing to show for it...except for higher oil prices, bigger profits at Haliburton & Raytheon and all the other military industrial complex companies. Now what? Go watch zeitgeist and learn a thing or two!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 07:38 AM
 
59,555 posts, read 27,717,657 times
Reputation: 14418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pequaman View Post
Bush & Blackwater got us into these expensive as$ wars. They looted us for 7 years and still looting us as we speak and you're talking about OB overspending??? The war has cost over $1+ Trillion to date with nothing to show for it...except for higher oil prices, bigger profits at Haliburton & Raytheon and all the other military industrial complex companies. Now what? Go watch zeitgeist and learn a thing or two!
Typical looney left rant.

The wars are not Bush's wars, they are America's wars.

THE DEMOCRATS VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE ACTIONS IN IRAQ AND AFGAN.

THE DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR ALL THE MONEY SPENT IN IRAQ AND AFGAN.

Ask the Iraqi people if THEY think it was "worth" it.

Ask them if they want the "Butcher of Bagdad" back.

Are you talking about the Haliburton that Clinton awarded a no bid contract to?

Many businesses do well during extreme times.

Ask any body and fender shop when they have the most business. It is after bad weather.

Ask a glass company. They do a great business before and after big storms.

It only makes sense that those that provide goods and services to the military will do better during times of war.

Your hatred for anything Bush has clouded your reasoning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:17 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,060,453 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Typical looney left rant.

The wars are not Bush's wars, they are America's wars.

THE DEMOCRATS VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE ACTIONS IN IRAQ AND AFGAN.

THE DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR ALL THE MONEY SPENT IN IRAQ AND AFGAN.

Ask the Iraqi people if THEY think it was "worth" it.

Ask them if they want the "Butcher of Bagdad" back.

Are you talking about the Haliburton that Clinton awarded a no bid contract to?

Many businesses do well during extreme times.

Ask any body and fender shop when they have the most business. It is after bad weather.

Ask a glass company. They do a great business before and after big storms.

It only makes sense that those that provide goods and services to the military will do better during times of war.

Your hatred for anything Bush has clouded your reasoning.
Now that's a contradiction... Your hate for Obama has clouded your reasoning...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,045 posts, read 27,305,760 times
Reputation: 7384
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Clinton raised the top marginal tax rate from 31 percent to 39.6 percent. Contrary to the apocalyptic predictions forwarded from the Austrian school, the U.S. economy sustained the longest period of growth in U.S. history from 1992 to 2000. Clinton produced a historical high of 21 million new jobs.

Interest-rates fell by 40 percent, facilitating the greatest housing boom in history; inflation fell to 2.5 percent, halving the average of the previous 12 years; and the largest budget surplus in history, $128 billion, was created despite Reagan’s mammoth deficits.
That's fine, but make sure you also revert the Bush tax cuts on the lower brackets, cut the dependent children tax credit in half, and reinstate the marriage penalty too.

After all, these were part of Bush's tax cut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:30 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,060,453 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
That's fine, but make sure you also revert the Bush tax cuts on the lower brackets, cut the dependent children tax credit in half, and reinstate the marriage penalty too.

After all, these were part of Bush's tax cut.
All tax cuts remain for everybody making under $250,000...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,748 posts, read 22,534,306 times
Reputation: 14199
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Clinton raised the top marginal tax rate from 31 percent to 39.6 percent. Contrary to the apocalyptic predictions forwarded from the Austrian school, the U.S. economy sustained the longest period of growth in U.S. history from 1992 to 2000. Clinton produced a historical high of 21 million new jobs.

Interest-rates fell by 40 percent, facilitating the greatest housing boom in history; inflation fell to 2.5 percent, halving the average of the previous 12 years; and the largest budget surplus in history, $128 billion, was created despite Reagan’s mammoth deficits.
Are we a socialist collective now? Does my getting to keep more of the money I earn depend upon how well it stimulates the economy?

Government spends too much money, get them to stop it, before you decide i need to lose more of my wealth.

BTW, the democrats owned huge majorities in both houses of congress during Reagan, always look to blame the congress for spending us into deficits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2010, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,045 posts, read 27,305,760 times
Reputation: 7384
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
All tax cuts remain for everybody making under $250,000...
Nah, I dislike the class warfare stuff.

This is an issue where folks should either keep the cuts or get rid of them, none of this "I'll keep mine, but you lose your benefit" stuff.

Just junk the whole thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top