Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:02 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,139,161 times
Reputation: 2908

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
What gays want to do is force others to accept gay sex as normal by labeling their unnatural unions marriage.
Paranoia strikes deep in the heartland.

Plastic is unnatural but I don't hear anyone complaining about it.

Mills Darden weighed over 1200 lbs. His wife weighed less than 100. That ain't natural!

Why is gay the only group that it's socially acceptable to hate, demean, distort, lie about, accuse, demonize, reject?

As a gay man, all I want is my lover and I to get all the legal things that a straight couple gets in terms of powers and protections. If you consider that 'force' then you must have a hard time on a sunny day since we all know the sun 'forces' you to squint. That unnatural sun (fists in air)!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:03 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCPUNK View Post
The heterosexual model of marriage has been such a success, hasn't it?




Since marriage is a religious ceremony, it would reason that it is heterosexual. Two dudes can't pack fudge and create life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,286,152 times
Reputation: 11416
What amazes me is that most of the haters are christers; you know, the religion of love.

Didn't their Jesus say to treat others as you want to be treated; so as you do unto the least of your brethern, you do to me?

I sure don't see this treatment as love.
Who would Jesus hate?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Since marriage is a religious ceremony, it would reason that it is heterosexual. Two dudes can't pack fudge and create life.
It is not.
When you get divorced, who do you go to for dissolution of your marriage?
The STATE.
The State allows religious organizations to perform marriages for the STATE.

Please show otherwise.
Betcha 50 cents that you can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:05 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,139,161 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
And would other judges interpret the law differently?
Possibly, but then we're talking about Iowa's Constitution, not any other states. So are we saying we keep firing the Supreme Court until we get the decision we want? Has any Supreme Court said NO to this issue when given the same argument and working with a Constitution that wasn't already altered by the right wing to disallow gay marriage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:10 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,924,929 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
Possibly, but then we're talking about Iowa's Constitution, not any other states. So are we saying we keep firing the Supreme Court until we get the decision we want? Has any Supreme Court said NO to this issue when given the same argument and working with a Constitution that wasn't already altered by the right wing to disallow gay marriage?
That was the point I was trying to make. The law is what it is and voting out judges is not going to change the law. And I don't think there is any appetite for a constitutional amendment on the subject either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:13 PM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,090,222 times
Reputation: 2863
Now that is some GREAT NEWS! All across this country we need to identify activist judges and oust them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:14 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,139,161 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
That was the point I was trying to make. The law is what it is and voting out judges is not going to change the law. And I don't think there is any appetite for a constitutional amendment on the subject either.
As I understand it, once those judges made their determination, the only way to oppose it was to wait until 2012 and get 2/3 of the state house to overturn it, which was very unlikely. This so enraged the religious right that millions in outside dollars were spent to oust three judges that were crucial to the decision. You're right, it won't change anything but it sure shows exactly how hateful, spiteful, and anti-Christian the Christian right has become.

I keep insisting that we don't need terrorists to destroy our country. We have each other!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:20 PM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,090,222 times
Reputation: 2863
You are right we don't need terrorists to destroy our country when we have gays doing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:22 PM
 
25,157 posts, read 53,952,004 times
Reputation: 7058
If it's a holy sanctity then why are Republicans the ones who use pornography the most? And why is the divorce rate so high amongst Republicans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcm2010 View Post
Maybe because marriage is a holy sanctity...duh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 01:23 PM
 
25,157 posts, read 53,952,004 times
Reputation: 7058
Our country has been in worse situations i.e., 1920s era depression, the great depression, world war 1 and 2, Vietnam, etc. None of which were caused by gays prancing around singing Broadway tunes to themselves. The majority of crimes that effect the public at large are committed by corporate leaders i.e., Enron, Arthur Anderson, WorldCom, etc. None of them had gay leaders. Let's be for real.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
You are right we don't need terrorists to destroy our country when we have gays doing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top