Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2010, 12:29 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,321,155 times
Reputation: 1911

Advertisements

I tried to count every instance of a Tea Party candidate being chosen instead of an establishment-backed Republican (for example, Scott Brown had Tea Party support but he never defeated an establishment Republican in a primary so he is not on this list). Then I looked at what the general election outcome was.

Christine O'Donnell defeated Mike Castle in Delaware and LOST
Rand Paul defeated Trent Grayson in Kentucky and WON
Sharron Angle defeated Sue Lowden in Nevada and LOST
Mike Lee defeated Bob Bennett in utah and WON
Joe Miller defeated Lisa Murkowski in Alaska and LOST (to Murkowski, so the seat stays Republican)
Ken Buck defeated Jane Norton in Colorado and LOST

The losses of Tea Party candidates to the Senate are equivalent to the margin by which the GOP fell short of 50 seats.

Thanks for being crazy, Republicans
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2010, 12:30 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,321,155 times
Reputation: 1911
4 of 6 = a 66% lose rate. Yeah, keep moving right! You clearly have a mandate to keep moving right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 12:41 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
I note how you guys forgot to list some other prominant candidates..
Ron Johnson WIN..
Nikki Haley, WIN

And you also fail to understand that the Tea Party endorsed Democrats as well as Republicans
Walt Minnick from idaho for example..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 01:31 AM
 
Location: Canada
2,158 posts, read 1,995,111 times
Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I note how you guys forgot to list some other prominant candidates..
Ron Johnson WIN..
Nikki Haley, WIN

And you also fail to understand that the Tea Party endorsed Democrats as well as Republicans
Walt Minnick from idaho for example..

Unfortunately, like most people, I think he gets his way of thinking from the major news networks. For once, I'd like to see people break away from this paradigm of gleaning our attitudes from the mass media.
For goodness' sake people, THINK FOR YOURSELVES! The TV isn't some kind of truth box.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 01:37 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,191 posts, read 19,473,387 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I note how you guys forgot to list some other prominant candidates..
Ron Johnson WIN..
Nikki Haley, WIN

And you also fail to understand that the Tea Party endorsed Democrats as well as Republicans
Walt Minnick from idaho for example..
It was pretty obvious what the Minnick endorsement was (which he rejected btw). It was a way to say look we aren't endorsing all Republicans see, meanwhile it was one Democrat compared to 138 Republicans. Minnick saw it for what it was and rejected the endorsement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 01:39 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,031,367 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
.

Thanks for being crazy, Republicans
Ha-ha, you live in California. Get back to us in 2 years. Just make sure it isn't to beg for taxpayer money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 01:55 AM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,175,529 times
Reputation: 3346
I'm so grateful I live in California where the Tea Party hasn't made much inroads. I think the Tea Party is populated with crazies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 02:20 AM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,450,395 times
Reputation: 3647
Stop talking about the Tea Party! Just like the Bush presidency was declared never to have ever happened in 2009, so shall the Tea Party be declared to never have happened in 2011 now that the Repugs have the majority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 02:47 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,134,648 times
Reputation: 9409
The Tea Party is one component of the conservative message. Millions of people who cast their ballots were never TP affiliates, but shared the same or similar sentiments. The totality of the circumstances is what matters. The electorate is piissed and it shows in the election results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 03:20 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,227,792 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
I tried to count every instance of a Tea Party candidate being chosen instead of an establishment-backed Republican (for example, Scott Brown had Tea Party support but he never defeated an establishment Republican in a primary so he is not on this list). Then I looked at what the general election outcome was.

Christine O'Donnell defeated Mike Castle in Delaware and LOST
Rand Paul defeated Trent Grayson in Kentucky and WON
Sharron Angle defeated Sue Lowden in Nevada and LOST
Mike Lee defeated Bob Bennett in utah and WON
Joe Miller defeated Lisa Murkowski in Alaska and LOST (to Murkowski, so the seat stays Republican)
Ken Buck defeated Jane Norton in Colorado and LOST

The losses of Tea Party candidates to the Senate are equivalent to the margin by which the GOP fell short of 50 seats.

Thanks for being crazy, Republicans
Rubio
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top