Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by progmac View Post
rather than post to a message board, why don't you use the google to find some of the studies comparing the consumers of various news organizations.
NPR as a legitimate news organization would have released that information, especially if they were making such an outlandish claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2010, 07:25 AM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,771,776 times
Reputation: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
FoxNews.com - NPR President: Our Listeners Are Smarter -- Just See What They Said About Balloon Boy (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/08/npr-president-listeners-smarter-just-said-balloon-boy/?test=latestnews - broken link)

If they are so intelligent, why haven't they:

1) use scientific methods to verify their claims (lexical/semantic analysis of discussion boards, etc)?

2) Found a method to pay their way?
I don't get why people bash NPR. It is one of the most "unbiased" sources of news because the vast majority comes from local sources.

It is one of the last stations that plays local music, since most radio is now owned by Clear Channel (i.e. a business).

Something like 5% of total funding comes from the government. The rest comes from other sources. It is actually a well run non-profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati
3,336 posts, read 6,944,235 times
Reputation: 2084
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
NPR as a legitimate news organization would have released that information, especially if they were making such an outlandish claim.
they have. again, check the google. the premise of your argument is invalid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by progmac View Post
they have. again, check the google. the premise of your argument is invalid.
I'm desperately seeking peer reviewed literature used as a basis for their statistical model. I've found neither a model nor the literature.

I mean, use Flesch-Kincaid, information content...anything to base your claim on. Haven't seen it even on google. Let me know if you find it and I'll be happy to read the link. Thanks man!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 11:28 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,749,338 times
Reputation: 9728
One criterion for making such a statement might be the percentage of listeners holding degrees
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 11:32 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,749,338 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Actually, I don't have cable and therefore cannot watch Fox News. I also do listen to NPR, but only news related content.

Yes, they say their viewers are smarter...but are they really? What scientific method are they using to verify this claim?
You can listen to Fox online.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 11:41 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,159,646 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73
use scientific methods to verify their claims (lexical/semantic analysis of discussion boards, etc)?
Hahaha, 1,690 comments at that Fox article

Twenty-foot diameter, 4-feet-tall would get you about 77 pounds of lift at sea-level, not including the weight of the equipment. Average 6-year-old is 45 pounds, average weight of equipment would be 32 pounds, which might have been reasonable if there was very thin Mylar

vs.

Liberals = College educated dumbazzzzes that think they are smart ("3 people liked this")


? u b d juj.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 11:43 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
572 posts, read 1,611,066 times
Reputation: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maabus1999 View Post
I don't get why people bash NPR. It is one of the most "unbiased" sources of news because the vast majority comes from local sources.

It is one of the last stations that plays local music, since most radio is now owned by Clear Channel (i.e. a business).

Something like 5% of total funding comes from the government. The rest comes from other sources. It is actually a well run non-profit.

Wikipedia says it was 16% last year. Not a huge percentage by any means (way less that the profit margin of companies like Exxon) but enough to legitimately say that without it they wouldn't be able to compete in the market place.

Quote from Wikipedia:


In 2009, (NPR) member stations derived 6% of their revenue from local government funding and 10% of their revenue from the federal funding in the form of CPB grants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 11:46 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,594,614 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
FoxNews.com - NPR President: Our Listeners Are Smarter -- Just See What They Said About Balloon Boy (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/08/npr-president-listeners-smarter-just-said-balloon-boy/?test=latestnews - broken link)

If they are so intelligent, why haven't they:

1) use scientific methods to verify their claims (lexical/semantic analysis of discussion boards, etc)?

2) Found a method to pay their way?
smarter than the average bear...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2010, 12:03 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,201,643 times
Reputation: 7693
NPR unbiased? I can't remember the last time I heard something worthwhile come out of that organization. I hear numerous negative news items and reports from them on conservatives, not one negative thing on sheik obama or any of his staff.

NPR is like Apple, a holier-than-thou nose in the air attitude. I'm sure Kerry and Gore give them a two thumbs up....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top