Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:19 AM
 
6,034 posts, read 10,692,230 times
Reputation: 3990

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wellyouknow View Post
Yes. Check out "last supper" for an example - Da Vinci's frescos. Ancient Icons. etc...
I absolutely adore da Vinci's work! Also Botticelli, della Francesca, Cellini, Ghirlandaio, Raphael, Bernini and of course Michelangelo. So to you who are saying atheists would be all offended and incensed about religious artwork being displayed in the Smithsonian, I say hell no! Bring it on. There is some fan-damn-tastic religious art out there, and I love looking at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,034 posts, read 22,203,129 times
Reputation: 13842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar View Post
Everybody's a critic. There are a lot of works of art that I don't like either, but I think we still need to encourage artists to produce artwork. Art is one of the things that generates discussion and sometimes addresses sensitive subjects in a way that gets people talking about them. That's not a bad thing, and just because you don't like the particular artwork doesn't make it wrong or a waste of money.
Hey, if it denigrates Christianity and celebrates homosexuality, then its thought provoking, cerebral art, and the American tax dollar needs to fund it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:34 AM
 
6,034 posts, read 10,692,230 times
Reputation: 3990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Hey, if it denigrates Christianity and celebrates homosexuality, then its thought provoking, cerebral art, and the American tax dollar needs to fund it.
Religion should not and is not free from being criticized. Don't like it? Too bad, so sad. You do not have the right to never be offended. Religion should be criticized! So should any exclusionary dogma. So should anything that subjugates people, discriminates against freedom of speech, teaches bigotry and hatred, or oppresses any person simply because they were born a certain way.

If your religion can't survive that, it is fatally flawed and it doesn't deserve to exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:34 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,975,057 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Hey, if it denigrates Christianity and celebrates homosexuality, then its thought provoking, cerebral art, and the American tax dollar needs to fund it.
Distgusting. This is not "art" it is pornography. While I understand that this falls under the 1st Amendment the Smithsonian should use more discretion if taxpayer funds are being used.

With freedom comes responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:34 AM
 
1,011 posts, read 1,017,705 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Hey, if it denigrates Christianity and celebrates homosexuality, then its thought provoking, cerebral art, and the American tax dollar needs to fund it.
Yeah, I am an American and I pay tax dollars for Art to be displayed in my national museums. If it's thought provoking and cerebral all the better! I like my Art that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:42 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,410,258 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Distgusting. This is not "art" it is pornography. While I understand that this falls under the 1st Amendment the Smithsonian should use more discretion if taxpayer funds are being used.

With freedom comes responsibility.

Ah, yes, the Smithsonian should only display art that *I* like/agree with. Solid argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:44 AM
 
1,011 posts, read 1,017,705 times
Reputation: 467
Lol, "denigrades Christianity" - missed that. Do you know that many Renaissance Christian themed masterpieces were first thought they "denigraded Christianity"

Methinks you are too sensitive to enjoy the art form in all its glory. For now sit outside, sulk and reflect. Then come back in and enjoy art in all its aesthetic glory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,581,256 times
Reputation: 14863
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellyouknow View Post
Lol, "denigrades Christianity" - missed that. Do you know that many Renaissance Christian themed masterpieces were first thought they "denigraded Christianity"
Exactly. Look at the portraits done by Albrecht Dürer as an example. Considered by many to be one of the greatest portrait artists, his portraits of Christ in his own image were considered by many at the time the ultimate acts of blasphemy, especially the one below. Now people just consider it a beautiful portrait.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:56 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,975,057 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Ah, yes, the Smithsonian should only display art that *I* like/agree with. Solid argument.
Your words, not mine. FAIL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2010, 08:56 AM
 
3,337 posts, read 5,124,196 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellyouknow View Post
Didn't we just talk about this in another thread?

Anyway, plenty of non-Christian are taxpayers as well, so that point is moot. Don't like the art? Avert your eyes.
Ok. Avert your eyes when you see a Christmas tree and manger set up in a public place then. Works both ways. Actually, more than likely it doesn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top