Dr Paul Roberts, Distinuished Fellow at the Cato Institute among many other titles - says 9-11 is Bunk! (rating, difference)

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U

So what stopped the kinetic explosion from burning off the jet fuel?

The fact that most of the fuel did not vaporize at impact. I already told you that.

Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U

Then you compare that explosion to a cigarette butt. Give me a break.

I can't give you breaks anymore. You used up all your breaks a very, very long time ago.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson

he lowest temperature at which the vapor of a combustible liquid can be made to ignite momentarily in air.

Very good.

Now tell us the difference between "a combustible liquid" and "the vapor of a combustible liquid."

Use as many words as you want. Extra credit for complete sentences.

[TruthBTold2U]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

You don't seem to know what "flash point" means. It has nothing to do with explosions.

We should all bow down to such a Superior being as yourself. We're not worthy of such a treasure as yourself and your ego.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by HC475

Notice the music track at the very beginning and the feedback sound effect at the very end... Because the sound of broken glass is harder to replicate so they decided to use feedback effect to cover up the original sound track during the last few seconds...

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The sound of broken glass is trvially easy to replicate. All you have to do is actually break glass.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U

We should all bow down to such a Superior being as yourself.

Not all of you.

Now stop whining like a beaten stepchild and try to actually say something worthwhile.

[TruthBTold2U]

Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson

he lowest temperature at which the vapor of a combustible liquid can be made to ignite momentarily in air.

there was air
there was fire (source of ignition)
there was fuel
there was sufficient temperature

Give me a flippin' break. You're wrong. the jet fuel did not "dribble down" the steel girders. It ignited, because all of the components of ignition were PRESENT.

20yrsinBranson

Imagine that, one can not expect fuel to ignite under such conditions. Flight 800 blew up pretty well when electrical spark occurred

[HC475]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The sound of broken glass is trvially easy to replicate. All you have to do is actually break glass.

So why does the same video have 2 different sound tracks?... Somebody didn't want to break glass in during the fake recording...

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by HC475

So why does the same video have 2 different sound tracks?

Don't know. Don't care. I only know that it has nothing to do with the sound of breaking glass.

[20yrsinBranson]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

Very good.

Now tell us the difference between "a combustible liquid" and "the vapor of a combustible liquid."

Use as many words as you want. Extra credit for complete sentences.

Here, let me make as easy for you to understand as I can.

ARF: MSDS: Kerosene

20yrsinBranson

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U

Imagine that, one can not expect fuel ignite under such conditions.

Please try to keep up, TBT2U. Nobody has said "one can not expect fuel ignite under such conditions." Quite the opposite.

Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U

Flight 800 blew up pretty well when electrical spark occurred

Since Branson has punted because he cannot answer the question, you give it shot.

Tell us the difference between "a combustible liquid" and "the vapor of a combustible liquid."