Hispanic Convert to Islam Arrested in Baltimore Bomb Plot

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Guamanians

It is common knowledge

No, I believe it's a common delusion of the NeoConfused

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

If you cannot really see that liberals, even many here on this board go out of their way to protect Muslims then you have absolutely no clue as to what is going on and never will.

Many liberals hate religion or religious thing but all of a sudden they seem to love anything Muslim. Why?

Did you even read the thread on the Muslim women who refused to remove her cover for a criminal photo shoot? Liberals here went out of their way to say she has the right of religious freedom to leave it on.

Get real.

What I cannot see is anything factual to support your baseless, inane, asinine allegation that "Liberals try to protect Muslims and even go as far as trying to aid them and their radical religion"


Get a clue, your opinion IS NOT fact!

And if you're really so silly as to believe freedom of religion exists if applied only to certain religions you have no understanding of what freedom of religion means.

[rogerbacon]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

I meant billions. As there is more than 1.0 billion which means grammatically the plural is correct.

Well, for moth things plural means two or more. Since the unit in discussion wa s'billion' I would think 'billions' would be 2 or more 'billion''. Regardless, its a lot of people.

And your simile is not accurate. I stand by my statement that all religious extremists are political, but the Muslim religion is no more political than Christianity. You do remember the Crusades.

The crusades were indeed a political reaction to hundreds of years of a political Islamic invasion and conquest campaign that had conquered almost half of the Christian world. The Crusades were a belated defensive effort to repel invaders. They failed. One of the reasons they failed is because Christianity is not inherently political and the forces did not fight as a unified whole. Whereas the Muslims were quite used to organizing their armies under a single leader as they had been since the time of Mohammad. Political activism is ancillary to Christianity. In Islam it is a core part of the ideology.

The Christian church has been for more political intrusive over its long history than the Muslim faith. And there are not many millions of Muslims waging jihad against the US.

Well ther are not millions waging VIOLENT jihad against us but there may be millions backing the jihad through other means, including finantial donations and stealth jihad -- undermining our resolve through propaganda, political maneuvering, and ideological indoctranation efforts. CAIR is an example of one such group. The Muslim Brotherhood is another.

We shouldn't just be grateful if the VAST majority of Muslims don't participate in jihad, we should be wary of waging war against a religion, or even discriminating against a religion in a country founded on the principle of Freedom of Religion. That's a principle, don't they even matter anymore?

So we should be good little dhimmis and be wary of angering them by standing up to their jihad? What they include under the umbrella of "religion" is a lot broader than what the Founding Fathers intended in the first ammendment.

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by rogerbacon

Well, for moth things plural means two or more. Since the unit in discussion wa s'billion' I would think 'billions' would be 2 or more 'billion''. Regardless, its a lot of people.


The crusades were indeed a political reaction to hundreds of years of a political Islamic invasion and conquest campaign that had conquered almost half of the Christian world. The Crusades were a belated defensive effort to repel invaders. They failed. One of the reasons they failed is because Christianity is not inherently political and the forces did not fight as a unified whole. Whereas the Muslims were quite used to organizing their armies under a single leader as they had been since the time of Mohammad. Political activism is ancillary to Christianity. In Islam it is a core part of the ideology.



Well ther are not millions waging VIOLENT jihad against us but there may be millions backing the jihad through other means, including finantial donations and stealth jihad -- undermining our resolve through propaganda, political maneuvering, and ideological indoctranation efforts. CAIR is an example of one such group. The Muslim Brotherhood is another.


So we should be good little dhimmis and be wary of angering them by standing up to their jihad? What they include under the umbrella of "religion" is a lot broader than what the Founding Fathers intended in the first ammendment.

I stand up to jihad. Your jihad as well as theirs. Because you are waging a holy war, when you target one religion and call all practitioners of that religion your enemy, that is jihad. It's wrong when Muslim extremists do it, and it's just as wrong when narrow-minded bigots do it.