Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:38 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,089 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13727

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shane... View Post
How do we know that the US system has shorter waiting lists? All I wanted to know was how you came to your conclusion that the NHS in Britain has longer waiting lists than the public system in the US?
Cite a source stating American patients have to wait 3 years for cardiac surgery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,626,069 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Dah, except for the fact its not free in Canada (or anywhere else). I have a business partner in Canada who had to pay for nurses to take care of his mother in the home because insurance wont cover it. Here, they are covered.. So you want reduced care? What an odd position to hold..
So why is the US losing jobs to Canada?
Why is Canada more business friendly than the US, with a better economy and lower unemployment?
Rick Wagoner before he was fired said that GM laid off a smaller percentage of its Canadian workforce than its US work force because of Canada having single payer. (And, FWIW, GM has operated in Canada as long as it has operated in the US)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:41 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,089 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13727
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
It will be ruled constitutional. even the supremes don't want chaos.
What chaos?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:43 PM
 
Location: THE USA
3,257 posts, read 6,131,301 times
Reputation: 1998
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Dah, except for the fact its not free in Canada (or anywhere else). I have a business partner in Canada who had to pay for nurses to take care of his mother in the home because insurance wont cover it. Here, they are covered.. So you want reduced care? What an odd position to hold..
Canada has universal care for everyone... meaning it is the same price for everyone dear, whether it is $0 or $1,000.00. That is- we all would be paying the same rate, there would be NO elitist plans vs. Medicaid plans. The poor and the rich would get the same chance at survival and proper health treatments. Everyone would be treated equal which does not happen here.

Health care in Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No, in the US people are NOT covered for in home care or whatever your specific needs are. It depends on what company and plan you are on. Do you not know this?

What on earth makes you think that Hospice OR rehabilitation is always covered??? Too funny, you don't sound old enough to be on your own plan. Or you would know all this.

Please stop talking for you have no idea what you are saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:44 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
So why is the US losing jobs to Canada?
Why is Canada more business friendly than the US, with a better economy and lower unemployment?
Rick Wagoner before he was fired said that GM laid off a smaller percentage of its Canadian workforce than its US work force because of Canada having single payer. (And, FWIW, GM has operated in Canada as long as it has operated in the US)
Do you think the US is losing jobs to Canada because the businesses care about the employees? They care ABOUT THEMSELF.. The fact that they have a single payer means lower BUSINESS costs, not employees. And the fact that the employees have less costs, means they get less care.

Again, in Canada you cant get a nurse to come to individuals homes without it being paid for out of pocket.. Here you can because insurance pays for it.. One way or another its being paid for. Do you support the need to be paying out of pocket to have a nurse come to your home? Then why shouldnt you support the need to have people pay to see a doctor for routine checkups?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:54 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taboo2 View Post
Canada has universal care for everyone... meaning it is the same price for everyone dear, whether it is $0 or $1,000.00. That is- we all would be paying the same rate, there would be NO elitist plans vs. Medicaid plans. The poor and the rich would get the same chance at survival and proper health treatments. Everyone would be treated equal which does not happen here.
Clearly you have no clue as most liberals.. The only way under your scenario is if all medical care was paid for by government BUT ITS NOT.. Clearly the rich get better care in Canada because THEY CAN PAY for what isnt covered.. Only in liberal utopia world do people get 100% care and this does not describe Canada in the least. Spare me the wikipeia links which dispute nothing..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taboo2 View Post
No, in the US people are NOT covered for in home care or whatever your specific needs are. It depends on what company and plan you are on. Do you not know this? What on earth makes you think that Hospice OR rehabilitation is always covered??? Too funny, you don't sound old enough to be on your own plan. Or you would know all this.
Again, in Canada very little are covered.
The Hospice System in the USA
In fact, only 10% of Canadians with advanced illness actually receive hospice palliative care. The cost of being able to stay at home when terminally ill is considerable, and the patient or the family usually has to find this money. (In the USA hospice care is usually covered by Medicare or Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) payments).

In america, about 80% are covered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taboo2 View Post
Please stop talking for you have no idea what you are saying.
Clearly its YOU that has no clue as usual.. Why are you guys celebrating the Canadian system where the rich get better treatment than the poor because THEY PAY FOR IT?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,816 posts, read 6,401,344 times
Reputation: 9975
Quote:
Originally Posted by brattpowered View Post
I guess some kinds of activist judges are a-OK.
Yes, the ones that actually use what's written in the constitution instead of warping and twisting it into whatever their personal beliefs are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Milwaukee
1,045 posts, read 2,006,135 times
Reputation: 1843
I guess this makes Obama ZERO for Everything. The Republicans couldn't have picked a better Democrat for Presidents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 03:01 PM
 
166 posts, read 229,969 times
Reputation: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
I agree, I was just making a joke.

However the Germans wanted the EU to include Eastern Euro countries with historical ties to Germany in order to increase German influence within the EU, and with those countries included in the EU and the Schengen agreement has come more immigration from those countries. An "externality" is an unintended consequence.
Germany has not had more immigration from those countries though, as most EU states were allowed restrict immigration from the accession states for a number of years. The restriction ends soon though.
The only countries that didn't cap immigration were Ireland, the UK and possibly Denmark.

Sorry for not getting your joke in the earlier post

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Cite a source stating American patients have to wait 3 years for cardiac surgery.
Why? I'm not the one making any claims. I don't know which system is better.

I'm just asking how the US fares in relation to the NHS, which you were criticising.
You are working on the assumption that the US system has lower waiting times. The assumption may be correct, but it's impossible to know when you only provide stats for one system and use assumptions for the other.
It seems like you are selecting stats to confirm an opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2010, 03:03 PM
 
Location: THE USA
3,257 posts, read 6,131,301 times
Reputation: 1998
I have no desire to quote you because it is all so incorrect I don't know where to begin. Having a single payer health care system would make everyone happier. Yes, the rich could upgrade just like with cars. But currently people ARE DYING from poor health care insurance that will not cover them.


At least this way, they will get take care of, and those of us with money can pitch in and add some and get better stuff.

The insurance companies are corrupt and need to be reeled in.

Canada and the UK have better systems. The best is the Danish of course, part of the reason they are so happy is because they have universal health care, they have free college, and their government seems to understand that when you have happy healthy citizens, they work HARDER and longer, and ACHIEVE MORE than sick, poor, stupid citizens like the US has.


The Danish understand that the wealthy SHOULD Support the poor in times of need, they won't ALWAYS be needy, but it could happen to YOU or anyone really.

Table: The World's Happiest Countries - Forbes.com
"The Scandinavian countries do really well," says Jim Harter, a chief scientist at Gallup (http://topics.forbes.com/gallup - broken link), which developed the poll. "One theory why is that they have their basic needs taken care of to a higher degree than other countries. When we look at all the data, those basic needs explain the relationship between income and well-being."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top