Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2011, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Austin
453 posts, read 457,674 times
Reputation: 213

Advertisements

Bill Clinton got impeached for lying about Monica Lewinsky polishing his knob in the Oval Office when it had no bearing on the economy, nor was it nobody's business. That man balanced the federal budget, but that was irrelevent. George W. Bush took the equivalent of two years vacation the entire eight years he was in office. He lied about sending other people's children to die so Cheney could build an empire in the Middle East. Bush himself admitted on Meet The Press he couldn't find the link to Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks. Bush never found Osama Bin Laden like he promised, and he authorized torture at Guantanamo.

Barack Obama is a horrible President because he didn't pull out his magic wand and work up miracles overnight after he took office. It's all his fault deficit spending has gone wild, and he couldn't fix it even when Congress has given him hell since he's been in office. The national debt was irrelevant during the Bush Administration, yet now everyone us upset over deficit spending. Nevermind the fact that Obama ended the Iraq War Bush created, and he's now putting deadlines on our withdrawal from Afghanistan because he understands the price of these wars are ones neither we nor our children can afford. Forget about health care becoming more affordable for working class and poor people or the overturning of DADT. Disregard the 9/11 Health Benefits Bill, the START program, and the Food Safety Bill while we're at it.

It's considered socialism whenever we help the poor and middle class because they're there by choice. Spending money to build better schools, levees, dams, locks, roads, and bridges isn't cost-effective. Neither is extending unemployment because the blame lies on those out there unable to find jobs due to their lack of ambition rather than the ones who outsourced jobs overseas. Throwing out liferings for the rich is good for business because giving away $700 billion to Bank of America, AIG, and Citibank was supposed to remove us from the recession which it didn't. Furthermore, spending $1 billion on brand new sports complexes while the owners gets 10-percent profits is good for the community, but assisting those on welfare isn't worth our tax dollars. Am I reading this right?

Last edited by daugenstine; 01-04-2011 at 11:13 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2011, 10:59 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,944,845 times
Reputation: 12828
No, I do not think you are "reading this right". But, you are reading it from the typical liberal perspective so that is no suprise. Take of the partisan glasses and try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 10:59 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,457,656 times
Reputation: 4243
Yeah, yeah, we know. Barack Obama is a Saint and you don't understand why he can't make water into wine or walk on water. We get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:03 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
No, I do not think you are "reading this right". But, you are reading it from the typical liberal perspective so that is no suprise. Take of the partisan glasses and try again.
And just how is the OP factually wrong when viewed thru your partisan glasses?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:05 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,155,997 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
No, I do not think you are "reading this right". But, you are reading it from the typical liberal perspective so that is no suprise. Take of the partisan glasses and try again.
Please enlighten me....where were the "errors" in the OP?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:08 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,155,997 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yeah, yeah, we know. Barack Obama is a Saint and you don't understand why he can't make water into wine or walk on water. We get it.
Please show where that was stated in the OP.

Please show an "error" in the OP?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:15 AM
 
4,367 posts, read 3,485,145 times
Reputation: 1431
It was Attorney General Janet Reno who asked Ken Starr to investigate Clinton. The case wasn't about sex with an intern, it was about suborning perjury in the sexual harassment suit brought against Clinton by Paula Jones.

While I have never believed the Iraq invasion and war were necessary, I do find the oft juxtaposition of Clinton's impeachment and Bush's foreign policy to be, well, stupid. Especially considering that Clinton was impeached by Democrats and Republicans and the Iraq War was authorized by Democrats and Republicans.

Now go run to DailyKoz to find out what you should now think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,855,128 times
Reputation: 3315
Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, that's perjury and that's everyone's business when it's committed by the President. Bill Clinton didn't balance the budget and having the President of the United states on trial for perjury did indeed affect the economy. I don't have time to reply to all the other BS but you are right, Bush sucked just like Obama does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,855,128 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
It was Attorney General Janet Reno who asked Ken Starr to investigate Clinton. The case wasn't about sex with an intern, it was about suborning perjury in the sexual harassment suit brought against Clinton by Paula Jones.

While I have never believed the Iraq invasion and war were necessary, I do find the oft juxtaposition of Clinton's impeachment and Bush's foreign policy to be, well, stupid. Especially considering that Clinton was impeached by Democrats and Republicans and the Iraq War was authorized by Democrats and Republicans.

Now go run to DailyKoz to find out what you should now think.
Very well said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,096,532 times
Reputation: 2971
Pretty accurate from a general sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top