Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, the story is of the charged murderer parading as a legitimate physician.
I agree, this man lacked the training to perform the procedure, and besides the numerous women he harmed, he recklessly endangered countless others. His gross negligence amounts to abuse. From what the linked article says, he was a monster preying on vulnerable women.
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,300 posts, read 4,409,483 times
Reputation: 2394
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
I agree, this man lacked the training to perform the procedure, and besides the numerous women he harmed, he recklessly endangered countless others. His gross negligence amounts to abuse. From what the linked article says, he was a monster preying on vulnerable women.
He preyed on vulnerable women and murdered children who were actually born.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit
Funny how those "conservative, family values, pro-life" Republican's didn't introduce a single, solitary bill to overturn Roe v. Wade during the 6 years they held complete control of the federal government and could have passed anything they wanted, nor did Fox push them to do so.
In fact, as I recall, the subject never came up.
It's a ca$h cow for the GOP, I wouldn't expect much action, then what issue would they have?
Seems in the rush to divert the topic,some posters forgot to criticise the abortionist for murdering children....
Yep, shameful. Diversion is all the libs care about.
No biggie-->the title of the article, babies being scissored in the spine....
Attack the conservs is all that is cared about by many on here....just like Rahm said 'never let a serious crisis go to waste...'
Funny how those "conservative, family values, pro-life" Republican's didn't introduce a single, solitary bill to overturn Roe v. Wade during the 6 years they held complete control of the federal government and could have passed anything they wanted, nor did Fox push them to do so.
In fact, as I recall, the subject never came up.
A bill to overturn the Supreme Court's ruling which overturned state laws?
Perhaps you could help me out by indicating the part of the Constitution which grants the Congress authority to either legalize or outlaw abortion over the Supreme Court's ruling.
Fox likes the topic. It gives them something to air and hopefully increases their ratings. That's the extent of their caring.
They are number one and have been.
Why would they need higher ratings.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
