Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2011, 04:19 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,452,578 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithium View Post
Exactly. What Bush and the GOP did after 9/11 was similar to what Hitler and the Nazis did after the the Reichstag Fire. They used terrorist attacks to justify their power grabs...
LOL! I hate to burst your bubble, but the USAPATRIOT Act was a bipartisan bill. The GOP controlled House passed their version, and the Democrat controlled Senate passed their version. The two bills were then reconciled in conference. It was Senator Daschle who introduced the Senate version of the USAPATRIOT Act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2011, 04:48 AM
 
182 posts, read 129,944 times
Reputation: 58
If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 05:33 AM
 
764 posts, read 597,246 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
LOL! I hate to burst your bubble, but the USAPATRIOT Act was a bipartisan bill. The GOP controlled House passed their version, and the Democrat controlled Senate passed their version. The two bills were then reconciled in conference. It was Senator Daschle who introduced the Senate version of the USAPATRIOT Act.
Thats totally fair, and I realize alot of the Democrats also voted for the Iraq War. But it was Bush/Cheney/Rusfield who pushed the agenda.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3ntr0py View Post
If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
Something tells me the right wouldn't say that if it was Obama who was originally pushing the Patriot Act. Or if it was him who introduced something like No Child Left Behind. Or it was him who ignored a memo warning of what Bin Laden was planning a month before 9/11. Or if it was him who failed on a massive level when Iraq didn't have the WMDs (real WMDs, nuclear weapons like the Bush admin implied, not leftover stuff from the Iran-Iraq war) they were said to have, or any connection with Al Qaeda. Or if it was under his watch when we literally had a budget surplus, literal wealth, destroyed.

I love how these guys push the whole "THOSE WHO WOULD SACRIFICE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER! YA KNOW BEN FRANKLIN SAID THAT!", then turn around and play the ridiculous "NOTHING TO FEAR IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE" card...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 07:52 AM
 
4,563 posts, read 4,101,921 times
Reputation: 2286
Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudFR View Post
The Patriot Act, one of most prominent expansions of federal authority in the past decade, received overwhelming Republican backing in 2006 when it was first up for renewal. This year, even as the surge of the tea party brought to Washington a new legion of lawmakers suspicious of government power, the law again has a good chance of being reauthorized.
The first test comes this month, when three provisions of the act giving the government greater ability to monitor suspected terrorists expire and Congress must decide whether to extend them.
Since the law first passed with broad bipartisan support in October 2001, just after the 9/11 attacks, the debate has pitted civil libertarians against those who believe the government needs stronger tools to fight terrorism. Most of the law was made permanent in 2006.


Tea Party Unlikely to Derail Patriot Act Renewa - WSJ.com

Interesting !
The democrats aren't doing any better with the Patriot Act. It should've been repealed the day after Obama was sworn in. Now Leahy wants to renew provisions in it.

With regards to the OP and the TEA party, the only freedom that matters to them is the freedom to be as greedy and self interested as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 09:32 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24981
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3ntr0py View Post
If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
What was once old is new again.
It's cool to see the old communist slogans rolled out.
Lets hope our youth pick up on them

Last edited by Frank DeForrest; 02-06-2011 at 09:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,483,709 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Now your talking like a true blue blooded democrat
no, he is talking like a true old time republican...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithium View Post
Thats totally fair, and I realize alot of the Democrats also voted for the Iraq War. But it was Bush/Cheney/Rusfield who pushed the agenda.
So, according to this, the dems that voted for it are just mindless sheep who get coerced easily. At least you got that right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithium View Post
Something tells me the right wouldn't say that if it was Obama who was originally pushing the Patriot Act. Or if it was him who introduced something like No Child Left Behind. Or it was him who ignored a memo warning of what Bin Laden was planning a month before 9/11. Or if it was him who failed on a massive level when Iraq didn't have the WMDs (real WMDs, nuclear weapons like the Bush admin implied, not leftover stuff from the Iran-Iraq war) they were said to have, or any connection with Al Qaeda. Or if it was under his watch when we literally had a budget surplus, literal wealth, destroyed.
This post tells me you are biased. You make bad things up in this post about the Repubs because the Democrats policies are so bad you have to deflect. Few in Congress voted against The Patriot Act and our illegal invasion of a sovereign nation. The ones who voted against them on both issues are the ones we need to look towards for consistent leadership.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithium View Post
I love how these guys push the whole "THOSE WHO WOULD SACRIFICE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER! YA KNOW BEN FRANKLIN SAID THAT!", then turn around and play the ridiculous "NOTHING TO FEAR IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE" card...
"These guys"???? Anything is possible. But I do not know of ANYONE, much less these guys, who has flip flopped like that on this issue. I want to see proof of someone who actually believes in the Founders and the Constitution who has said that and changed. Especially if they are in the Tea Party. I want to see how they vote to make sure. Then expose that person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,259,715 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
LOL! I hate to burst your bubble, but the USAPATRIOT Act was a bipartisan bill. The GOP controlled House passed their version, and the Democrat controlled Senate passed their version. The two bills were then reconciled in conference. It was Senator Daschle who introduced the Senate version of the USAPATRIOT Act.
None the less, those with an agenda which includes government control over personal lives and taking away freedoms pushed the patriot act with all the fear cards showing at BOTH parties. They both bought it. Yes, they went through the motions but in the end it is still the draconian law it was intended to be. It legalized things which were not legal and created a basis to expand.

In this case it was 9-11 that created the excuse. One of the interesting things about the Reichstag fire is that in multiple decades of study nobody still knows how it was started and by whom. It's entirely possible the Nazi party just used the opportunity another extreme created to attack the Weimar republic. The Nazi's were just the best coordinated at taking on an opportunity. In the end it didn't matter who did it for they are also prime suspects. What matters is they knew how to use it to play their fear card and take power.

There have LONG been those here who like the idea of control, and laws have gotten in the way. Now some of those laws are no longer a problem. I doubt that the men with their boxcutters were thinking about it when they took over the planes, but they have accomidated the same kinds of mentality which created the world that created them. In a sense they won since we have had our rights compromised and sliced away since, and are slowly completing the slow frog boil, but in a sense everyone lost too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,259,715 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
What was once old is new again.
It's cool to see the old communist slogans rolled out.
Lets hope our youth pick up on them
I remember back when the first planes were hijacked and you had to open your luggage this was said. Most people didn't get the idea that little tiny seeds grow into giant trees once they set their roots.

The thing left undefined is just what you have to fear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,325 posts, read 5,509,755 times
Reputation: 2596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Rand Paul ran as a Republican, not a Libertarian. Had he run as a Libertarian he would most assuredly have lost. Like I said, Libertarians are closet anarchists, they have to try to hide what they are by pretending to be something they are not - in Rand Paul's case, he is pretending to be a Republican.
The reason both Ron Paul and Rand Paul are Republicans is because that is the only way they can successfully hope to apply their libertarian philosophy. The system is rigged against all third parties. In case you forget, Ron Paul ran as the Libertarian candidate for president 10 years ago and nobody knew him. That sure isn't the case now. But back to the topic, here is what he just said about the Patriot Act:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeWHG-RuCpE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top